10 months of testing

is also a computer layman, after graduating from the muddle up to do the test work. At present, more than 10 months of work, the test industry is also a little bit of understanding, here to write down the learning experience and testing knowledge, share with people and help themselves straighten out ideas, summing up knowledge is also excellent.

Suggest any new staff of technical post, when you do not know what you are doing, in front of a confused piece of time, you can calm down and think about it. Any technology is a means of survival, when you are still a novice in this technical position, you do not have so much power to say that it is useless or no future, attitude determines everything. As a test, I often hear that black-box testing is a little bit, and there is no technical content, and that is not the case. In fact, until last month, I still in that cognitive circle, the young people easily impetuous, always a bit ambitious. Whether it's a black box or a white box or an automated test, the tester's thinking or thinking is important. When you are skilled enough to master the basic testing skills, including familiar with the process, design use cases, bug tracking management, and even communication with the development of PD, you can handle it well, then you can be qualified to evaluate the black box test.

Although in the current company work for only 10 months, but I am very embarrassed to say that I am actually ready to change work, my cognition is: has been doing a project, the same product, the same system, the same test method, or black box test, so that the future is not more and more confused. Until a few days ago, a project of small responsibility, let me see their impetuous.

Project leader hand on the new live relatively busy, I also count "old" staff (PS: When I entered the project group, the project was just set up, as follows the project together to the present), the leader let me small responsible for the project now. One night to receive information, the next day to release the final release version to the manufacturer, before this to test the FOTA upgrade, functional traversal, there is a new version of the thing to verify, because it is outsourced testing company, we need more to cooperate with customers, time is tight, I and the other two colleagues very early past the company, Open the mailbox to see the mail, days, the mail is in the same letter with the hair, very much and chaos, a will be fake package and link, a will be updated fake package and link, one will be the latest fake package and link, followed by several new release version, the middle interspersed with the cc people between the quarrel and dialogue, I looked through the mail , combined with the group leader sent me the private messages, sleep finally figured out. The end result is: The version information in the development message is wrong, I am in a variety of information induced by the version of the wrong brush ... omitted here ... Alas, although it did not affect the release, but was still challenged by the leadership, and before that I was talking to him about leaving the matter, said he wanted to contact more products. He said: "In my cognition, you should not make this kind of mistake, if is a certain, he certainly does not like this." Although I feel quite bent, but this is to let me see the status of their own: dabbler, dangling up and dangling!!! Sink the heart to think, there are a lot of things themselves did not comb, perhaps the busy did not clear behind also forget to find out again.

Novice or to learn as the main goal, testing can look at the forum, buy some software engineering, testing books, reading can always bring you unexpected harvest, began to precipitate themselves.

　　

10 months of testing