2017 Object-oriented programming (Java) third Week study summary

Fleeting, Riyuerusuo, a blink of an eye, we have spent the third week of learning time, with the passage of time each day, I am the accumulation of knowledge gradually increased. There are, of course, many areas where we need to improve. Next, I will summarize the work of the TA in the third week, and I hope the teachers and students criticize me.

First of all, for last week's experiment, I summed up the following deficiencies: 1. As the students usually practice insufficient, class always appear to keep up with the teacher's rhythm phenomenon. 2. Individual students do not listen carefully in class, open other Web pages to do other things. 3. There are students who reflect the learning content more and more obscure, abstract, not easy to understand.

Second, for the blog, the shortcomings of the last week are: 1. Overall, the content of the blog is broad, too theoretical, no relevant examples, but also to enumerate their own learning and experimental difficulties. 2. Learning attitude is not correct, some students even do not blog, there are the following students: Ma Lun, Mao Provencale, Li Xianglong, Zassis-Caigen, Wang Huimin, Wang Ruiqiang, which Mao Provencale students have not written a blog post. Of course, there are well-done students, Kong Wenwen students in the blog in the last week to solve the problem of the TA, and his experiment in the problems encountered in a good summary, to give praise.

Again, the students to answer questions in the class is not positive, unexpectedly no classmate ask a question.

Finally, for this week's students handed in the experimental work to do the following summary: 1. Some students have no running results, and the experimental report has no learning summary. 2. May be due to the difficulty of programming problems, a large part of the students did not complete the last programming problem, and turned over the students, the answer is the same, from the same version. 3. Li Wei, submitted the experimental report with the teacher assigned tasks do not correspond to the problem. 4. Some of the students, the work is not complete, the soup to change, only handed over the task one, Maliping, Li Snow homework only half finished. 5. The most serious problem is that the study attitude is not correct, the work of plagiarism phenomenon, Ma Lun, Mao Provencale handed in the experimental report exactly the same, Wu Fangjuan students handed in the experimental report, the name is actually Tan Do, put forward serious criticism. In addition Lin Xiaowei students carefully and carefully, to their own learning experience also summed up in place, to give praise.

In view of the above phenomenon, after the discussion of the TA group, the following suggestions are put forward: 1. Teachers should increase the students in the classroom operation time, avoid classes under a wide range of assignments, the problem of copying and pasting. 2. The teacher can control the student's computer properly. 3. Students should not have inertia, to do hands-on practice, the effect of the practice is much larger than reading a textbook 10 times. 4. Students should correct their learning attitude, whether it is the experiment or blog post, should be taken seriously, do not write homework, plagiarism will only let you drift away, eventually out of the organization.

Last week, the shortcomings and advantages of learning, hope that teachers and students to give reasonable advice and suggestions!

2017 Object-oriented programming (Java) third Week study summary