Article 1: What kind of testers are needed

What kind of test is required by a ghost, so that no one has been recruited for so long? I personally think the test should have the following capabilities and functions:

 

Capability

1. Familiar with the software development process;

2. Be familiar with the software testing process;

3. Familiar with the use of test tools;

4. Understand How to Write test cases;

5. Understand How to Write test plans;

6. Understand problems arising from exchange analysis and testing;

7. Give suggestions to developers and designers from the test perspective;

8. I know how to "quarrel" with developers and will not "bully" them ";

9. Be careful, persistent, persistent, and other personal qualities;

 

Function

1. test the system bug;

2. summarize and analyze the types of bugs;

3. analyze the problem of the developer based on the bug;

4. It is best to summarize the labor costs caused by bugs;

5. Help the team optimize the development process together;

 

Test Status:

At present, many companies, especially small companies, have poor testers and limited capabilities. Many tests are only on the West Point of the page, and there are no relevant test cases. In fact, these tests should not be completed by testers and should be summarized into the unit tests of developers. A friend's company saw their test and analysis reports. 93% of the bugs belong to the unit test category. That is to say, 93% of the testers are testing for developers, this is where the tester is not properly positioned and should not be used by the tester as a developer.

Many testers do not perform automated tests, do not use test tools, or even do not know the development process. Even the reproduction of errors cannot be clearly described, let alone provide reasonable suggestions for developers. Generally, the cost of quality assurance accounts for about 40% of the total cost in the development process. However, in many companies, testers have the lowest level and the lowest income among all participating projects, many people cannot be competent in development are lost to the test position. Similarly, some students who cannot find the development work after graduation will take a step back to the test, students use many development courses, but seldom test professional courses. Many students do not know what to test, developers do not know, and the boss does not know!

An important part to ensure the quality system has become the most insignificant part. A position that should have been held by the best personnel, but by the weakest Person. The company does not pay much attention to testing, management personnel ignore testing, and developers bully testing ......, These should be the current situation of testing by many companies now! (It seems that csdn has no testing Forum)

 

Using an unqualified tester is worse than having no tester, I personally think!