Completely, the functionality of the Shell Python can be implemented, and the code is less, better structure, more readable, and Python can implement the functionality of the shell is not necessarily able, such as the operation of the use of the socket for network communication, the Web-enabled Django framework, Psutil modules for performance acquisition, and the Shell has a strong command dependency on the operating system, Python can be circumvented to a greater extent.
In a shell IDE is a big problem, although Python's native IDE is not good, but the third-party IDE is very powerful, although not comparable to Microsoft's virtual studio, but also can fully meet the development needs of Python.
In the case of Python's efficiency, Python supports multi-process, multi-threaded, and co-threading (smaller than thread), and program concurrency is on the shell. Python's core modules are basically implemented in C and are therefore more efficient. If necessary, Python modules that need to be implemented in Python can be rewritten in C to improve efficiency and, of course, directly with C python, a Python interpreter that is implemented directly and completely in C.
If you are interested in Python, hurry up and learn from the old boy!
Can python completely replace the shell? Python development