Comparison of Cisco SUP720's comprehensive performance in three aspects

In terms of the comprehensive performance of Cisco SUP720, how can we understand Cisco SUP720? You will find many methods on the network. The following article compares the performance in three aspects, hope to help the majority of fans. Compared with SUP720, The sup720-3BXL is mainly different from the PFC used by the two. The SUP720-BXL uses PFC3BXL, while the SUP720 uses PFCA, And the SUP720 can be upgraded to a SUP720-3BXL by replacing the PFC.

Cisco SUP720 Scalability:
◆ The number of Route entries increased from K to 1 M (IP v4)/00 K (IP v6)
◆ The number of netflow entries increased from 256 K to K
◆ The memory is upgraded from a maximum of MB for routing/switching to a maximum of 1 GB.
◆ 1024 VRF connections are supported, with each VRF700 route.

Cisco SUP720 security:
◆ The number of ACL tags increases from 720 to 512.
◆ Layer 2 ACL supported on IP
◆ 12 special case rate limiters are supported for DOS protection.
◆ ACE Records are supported.
◆ The number of reflex ACLs supported is increased from 256 K to K.

Cisco SUP720MPLS:
◆ Support for MPLS over GRE
◆ Support IP option in MPLS
◆ Any transport over mpls, including EoMPLS

3BXL requires IOS 12.2 (17b) SXA and later versions. Software supports multiple new features such as SRM with SSO.