Comparison of scalability and security between Microsoft IIS and Apache

Let's take a look at the comparative analysis of Microsoft IIS and Apache scalability. We know that scalability refers to whether WWW Service tools can be used in a variety of scenarios, network conditions, and operating systems.

Microsoft IIS can only be used in Microsoft's windows operating system. If you leave windows, nothing can be done. Cannot be transplanted to other types of operating systems.

APACHE is a versatile player. It is not only applicable to windows, but also for unix, linux, freebsd, and other operating systems. The configuration steps for different operating systems are similar and highly portable. Finally, we can see that Microsoft IIS can only run in windows, and apache has a wide range of applications. Apache wins. So far, let's continue to look at their security differences.

It is often seen that a website has been attacked by hackers or has been maliciously uploaded by illegal users. Security is the most important thing for websites that provide services to others. If the security of a website is not guaranteed, who is willing to browse and use it.

In the early days, Microsoft IIS had a major security issue. If you use the default settings, hackers can easily access them. However, in Microsoft IIS6, Microsoft has greatly improved its security. As long as the OS patch is updated in a timely manner, the website security factor can be improved as much as possible. In particular, Microsoft IIS6 and. net platforms rely on each other to ensure almost perfect security.

APACHE has always been doing well in terms of security, because many users use apache in linux, so the characteristics of the operating system make apache in linux have an inherent umbrella, and security is naturally not worth mentioning. Finally, we can conclude that versions earlier than Microsoft IIS6 have security risks. Microsoft IIS6 is as secure and reliable as APACHE. Microsoft IIS6 and APACHE beat each other.