I am not a UI guy. I only have some knowledge about CSS, especially the layout, which is always a headache. When I started feedzshare, I copied a layout from CSS Mastery (proficient in CSS.
Css framework simply sums up the commonly used styles in web design to facilitate reuse. A css framework usually includes layout, font and cross-browser support. for more information, see here. after knowing this stuff, I thought it was very suitable for me. It took some time to add the css framework to feedzshare.
Now there are quite a few mature CSS frameworks. After reading some CSS frameworks, I chose emastic:
- Lightweight, the simpler the better, the simpler the learning, and the simpler the use of the. feedzshare page. At present, I do not need more complex results. Yui is obviously too heavy;
- I don't want to change the current development method;
- I am a supporter of fluid. I don't like width. the trend of the computer screen is wide screen. I don't want my site to be 960 or any other fixed width. I want to adjust the content area with the user's screen width, more content can be displayed on the previous page of the wide screen to reduce unnecessary page down and display normally on the narrow screen.
Finally, most CSS frameworks can be filtered out. emastic is undoubtedly the best native support for fluid. according to Robert Mao, blueprint supports fluid through plug-ins. when I try blueprint to use the plug-in to layout fluid in three columns, the left and right sides can only set the width with percentages (if not, correct me), but I want the width to be fixed on both sides to display the menu, the intermediate content area can be automatically adjusted. so I finally chose emastic.
Kuber @ feedzshare
