Customized Desktops may become the main trend of desktop development in the future

Customized Desktop may become the main trend of future desktop development-general Linux technology-Linux technology and application information. The following is a detailed description. Low-cost computer hardware and Virtual Machine technologies will eventually bring us more diversified dedicated desktops. From XP to Vista, Microsoft has the so-called Home, Professional, Server and other versions in each version of Windows 7. From the first generation of Windows and Office, in order to reduce development and training costs, Microsoft, creating a unified desktop style and Component Construction Method is a bit like Ford's pipeline. The advantage of this is that it improves the development efficiency of the program, but to some extent it also limits the diversity of the program.

Since many Microsoft customers, each version upgrade must be compatible with the original application to the maximum extent, there has been no fundamental progress in Microsoft's kernel over the years. If the desktop requires both entertainment and efficiency and cost, but also security, it is difficult to fully implement it in the current environment.

With the development of Internet applications, the definition of desktops for different users has begun to change significantly. For office environments, BT and multimedia are often disasters. Entertainment is an indispensable element.

In the past, office Integration mainly focused on software deployment and LAN application construction. Now, it is gradually switched to Internet product selection and adaptation. With the advent of Linux, the desktop system began to flourish. However, Linux still follows Microsoft's philosophy to build a so-called universal desktop system. This idea is dangerous.

As the cost of computer hardware products declines year by year, at least office desktop, entertainment desktop, development desktop, game desktop, design desktop, and many other desktop systems with an application environment as factors should appear in the desktop field. In this way, security, stability, ease of use, computer configuration, environmental protection, and other needs can be taken into account to a large extent. Desktop systems can also better integrate Internet services into valuable and easy-to-use clients. Desktop Sharing and device sharing allow users to quickly switch from a client to other application clients to maximize the convenience of each application environment and use. Without mutual interference, resulting in an increase in compound costs.

With the gradual maturity of virtual machine technology, the ability of multiple computers to collaborate with hardware resources is also constantly improving. One day, we may look at the computer in this way. For each screen, you can start different desktops and transfer between different desktops as needed, each desktop is a complete build of the corresponding application environment. Push Notifycation Server to Push messages and results. Just like you are operating on different dedicated devices. It should be nice.

As I do now, I usually use Mac to process my own multimedia and photography. Use the integrated Address Book + Adium + Skype to manage instant messaging and teleconference. Use Google to build collaborative information and office file interaction systems. Use Remote Desktop to develop applications based on Windows and Linux. Share resources in the LAN with Bonjour. Use Wii and Xbox to play games and Apple TV to watch downloaded TV programs and movies. This minimizes the impact of viruses and malware on work and entertainment environments. Every application environment makes you feel satisfied and comfortable, with no adverse impact on each other.

Maybe we don't need a hichina machine in the future, just like WM basically porting the Windows operating environment to a mobile terminal, and the mobile terminal will become very difficult to use. Before the advent of the iPhone, it seems that everyone can endure the troubles brought about by this inconvenience. The consistency between the interface and the control is not necessarily a good thing.

It is also very difficult for us to accept. When operating TV, we use the so-called mouse-type operation method. Hanging our arm in the middle finger can make us feel ridiculous. Each type of desktop should be built based on its own special application environment and devices, and there should be different input devices, just as the Wii game controller has created a brand new experience.

Mac has four types of desktops: Mac, iPhone, iPod, and Apple TV (the operating experience is completely different from the Unified kernel system). Microsoft has Windows, Tablet, and Xbox, WM (the operating experience is basically consistent with the unified kernel system );

Linux has many desktops, but the positioning is not clear. If Apple's successful model is used, it may be the source of Linux's growth and growth. At least it should be used to build an office desktop, the market will soon be successful.