The second lecture of the new Japanese second lesson "Japanese is just getting started!
Let's talk about the last book! Speaking ...... Where is it? Er ...... Let me see. Oh! It refers to the sentence pattern of "sentence (sentence, sentence) Sentence ** sentence! This sentence indicates that "This (that) is ××. It can be clearly seen that this is a declarative statement, So how should we express the negative statement?
Let's talk about the sentence pattern "This (that) is not ××" today.
The last time I told you that Japanese is the verb placed at the end of the sentence, you can naturally guess that you want to express the meaning of the negative, and you will start from the last sentence. Good! The Japanese sentence "This (that) is not ××" is "zookeeper, Zookeeper, and zookeeper ", by comparing the above affirmative sentence patterns, we will find that the difference between the two sentences is that they use negative statements to express negative statements.
I think it will be a bit difficult to remember. I can all recall that I copied these seven Kana at my aunt's house to enhance my memory. In fact, Zookeeper has never been mentioned in the next lesson, which means "No (haven't, hasn' t)", while the role in zookeeper is, you may wish to understand it as a prompt Auxiliary Word to indicate that the negative verb "ありませ" is followed, while the remaining "で" is the trace of the sentence "です. This split is easy for everyone to understand, right? It's much easier than my 97-year-old hot summer days to write your work.
In addition, you need to note that when using the observer as the prompt Auxiliary Word, You do not read the HA, but read the wa. Yes, you are not mistaken. When the observer is doing the prompt Auxiliary Word, the pronunciation is exactly the same as the pronunciation. So, I believe everyone will be somewhat worried. Isn't it necessary to figure out the ingredients of the speaker before opening his mouth? You can rest assured that here I will teach you a skill: when there is only one nickname, it reads wa, and makes up a word in the nickname and other Kana, whether it is a noun or verb, adjectives or other things do not read wa. Therefore, the reading frequency in the reading frequency exceeds the reading frequency of WA.
As a matter of fact, I want to confess that the next lesson is the content of the second lesson, however, I have always been not very satisfied with its settings, because I learned the usage of zookeeper and zookeeper. I have not been thoroughly understood yet, and I have created another zookeeper, it is really a bit of pressure, so I am afraid to give it to everyone here, and use it as the negative usage of the Sentence Pattern in the previous lesson. This makes it easier for everyone to accept it first. When I was teaching lesson 3rd, I would like to explain the usage of "too many" and "too many.