Feedback from individual group reviews

Funny group: The content is very rich, in the first stage sprint did well, but things are not categorized, the interface is not very good, a bit messy. --We are sorting out the goods ~

XY Engineering Group: The user interface is done well, the product function is also good, the web is done well, summed up deeply, but have not seen how the backstage. --due to the lack of theoretical knowledge learning,
There's something we can't do in the background, but we're trying.

Little monster: The interface is also very messy, no items categorized, overall is good. --we're making adjustments to the interface

Anteam: The Division of labor is clear, the comparison has the mentality, the progress completes relatively well. --Thank you, we will continue to work hard ~

Newapps: Advantages: HTML page layout is clear,
Cons: The page is simple, with only a waterfall layout-we are improving the interface!

Together pal: Listen to the group name is a bit up on the feeling, campus flea market usually have to listen to songs, but put on the internet, do not know what kind of feedback.
Look at their early achievements, it is also true that there is a lot of work to do, but also need to be more to improve the strength. --we will continue to improve the writing of ~

Copyer: The user interface is doing well, the summary of the content is worthy of everyone to learn--

Snow makes: Noah's Ark made the interface is very beautiful, choose the topic is also very good. --Thank you, we will continue to work hard ~

Feedback from individual group reviews