China Unicom's "transfer via ticket" is the only effective solution to solve China Unicom's development dilemma.

China Unicom's "transfer via ticket" is the only effective solution to solve China Unicom's development dilemma.

Currently, the discussion on China Unicom's predicament has always been a hot topic in the forum. Many of them say that mobile has a great advantage in low frequency, some people say that the problem of changing allocation alone can change the difficulty of China Unicom. I plan to analyze it.

1. Low Frequency Spectrum determines the number of users. Low frequency spectrum is a major indicator, however, before 08 years ago, the number of users of China Unicom's GNET and the CNET was compared (only 4 million of the users of CNET in 02 years, and 0.1 billion of the users of GNET in 02 years, in 40 million, 0.14 billion of the self-proclaimed 20 million of the total number of customers on the Internet, and of the total number on the internet, only of the total number of users received by China Telecom ), after that, v companies in the United States sold low-spectrum products to Company a, proving that when a certain number of products were reached, this was no longer a decision.

2. are 6 m users satisfied? Of course, the answer is not enough, but is it acceptable? According to China Telecom's experience, users have been desperately developed within two years, there was indeed a network congestion, but I analyzed one. Where did they happen? It is the hotspot location in the city. In comparison with China Mobile and China Unicom, China Telecom has a higher value in terms of per capita low spectrum. However, China Mobile and China Unicom are normal in the hot spots in the city, it also proves that in that Service background, China Unicom had a lower-spectrum network that was smoother than China Telecom. That is to say, at that time, China Telecom should allocate more spectrum.

3. market rules, taking cpu as an example, when amd is making a low-price strategy, the market share is basically the lowest, and when amd is selling technology, their profit-making and market share must be high. When China Unicom used w net as a treasure 12 years ago, it missed the opportunity and often failed to launch the t-network chip in China Unicom, however, China Unicom does not claim that it is their best time to fight against low prices.

4. The side effects of the price war. The previous virtual operators mainly focused on price wars. Therefore, segment 170 is stinking. It is estimated that no one has objected to it. Now there is a traffic price war, and no one is stinking about it, because the traffic does not affect the number used by the host. Therefore, other common people cannot specifically mark what you are using.

5. The stability of the number. If the price is emphasized, people usually choose to use it temporarily. Although the price is only 10 yuan a month, no one cares about it in general (The problem is that if you don't care about it, why do you want to select a 10-bit-low one ?), But like a car, the imported brand of 80 thousand, the psychological superiority of the car owner is slightly higher than that of 50 thousand of the car owners, the sense of superiority is very blank, but the society is like this. If a person is alive, he or she will be shown to others.

To sum up, the reputation of China Mobile and China Telecom cannot be achieved under the current conditions. Only white-listed numbers can be removed from the brand's reputation, so that people no longer use numbers to distinguish others?

Of course, there is another group network and short number, which is also a big problem, but far from being more decisive (the solution is to force the activation of the same network condition to join the Board ).