KVM Bonding + Bridge Experiment

Test environment:

Name	Ip	OS	Bonding + Bridge	Speed
KVM	192.168.x.57	Centos6.3	Y	200 Mb/s
Vm_server1	192.168.x.61	Centos6.3	N	Variable
Vm_server2	192.168.x.62	Centos6.3	N	Variable
Server1	192.168.x.130	Centos6.0	N	100 Mb/s
Server2	192.168.x.254	Centos5.5	N	100 Mb/s

KVM Server Bonding + Bridge configuration

[Root @ localhost ~] # More/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em2

DEVICE = em2

ONBOOT = yes

BOOTPROTO = static

USERCTL = no

MASTER = bond0

SLAVE = yes

[Root @ localhost ~] # More/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em3

DEVICE = em3

ONBOOT = yes

BOOTPROTO = static

USERCTL = no

MASTER = bond0

SLAVE = yes

[Root @ localhost ~] # More/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-bond0

DEVICE = bond0

ONBOOT = yes

BRIDGE = br10

[Root @ localhost ~] # More/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br10

DEVICE = br10

ONBOOT = yes

BOOTPROTO = static

NM_CONTROLLED = "no"

IPADDR = 192.168.x.57

NETMASK = 255.255.255.0

BROADCAST = 192.168.x.255

NETWORK = 192.168.x.0

USERCTL = no

TYPE = Bridge

[Root @ localhost ~] # More/etc/modprobe. d/bonding. conf

Alias bond0 bonding

Options bond0 miimon = 100 mode = 4

Start two VMS and bind the two interfaces to br10.

[Root @ localhost ~] # Brctl show

Bridge namebridge idSTP enabledinterfaces

Br10 8000. d4bed9b5bc21 no bond0

Vnet0

Vnet1

Switch configuration. Only port-channel (LACP protocol) must be enabled)

Test:

1.Server1 and server2 exert pressure on vm_server1 and vm_server2

Results:

Vm_server1

650) this. width = 650; "src =" http://www.bkjia.com/uploads/allimg/131227/23325W912-0.png "title =" 1.png" alt = "163815208.png"/>

Vm_server2

650) this. width = 650; "src =" http://www.bkjia.com/uploads/allimg/131227/23325R296-1.png "title =" 1.png" alt = "163849529.png"/>

Server1

650) this. width = 650; "src =" http://www.bkjia.com/uploads/allimg/131227/23325Q928-2.png "title =" 1.png" alt = "164029693.png"/>

Server2

650) this. width = 650; "src =" http://www.bkjia.com/uploads/allimg/131227/23325W248-3.png "title =" 1.png" alt = "164149676.png"/>

2.Vm_server1 and vm_server2 exert pressure on Server1 and server2

Results:

Vm_server1

650) this. width = 650; "src =" http://www.bkjia.com/uploads/allimg/131227/23325V621-4.png "title =" 1.png" alt = "164331867.png"/>

Vm_server2

650) this. width = 650; "src =" http://www.bkjia.com/uploads/allimg/131227/23325SK0-5.png "title =" 1.png" alt = "164442.167.png"/>

Server1

650) this. width = 650; "src =" http://www.bkjia.com/uploads/allimg/131227/23325W019-6.png "title =" 1.png" alt = "164520779.png"/>

Server2

650) this. width = 650; "src =" http://www.bkjia.com/uploads/allimg/131227/23325W015-7.png "title =" 2.png" alt = "164535502.png"/>

3. Server1 each server2 puts pressure on vm_server1

Results:

Server1

650) this. width = 650; "src =" http://www.bkjia.com/uploads/allimg/131227/23325U4Q-8.png "title =" 1.png" alt = "165020910.png"/>

Server2

650) this. width = 650; "src =" http://www.bkjia.com/uploads/allimg/131227/23325Qc0-9.png "title =" 2.png" alt = "165044252.png"/>

Vm_Server1

650) this. width = 650; "src =" http://www.bkjia.com/uploads/allimg/131227/23325S452-10.png "title =" 2.png" alt = "164619944.png"/>

Test 3 shows that our vm_server1 virtual machine can accept traffic of nearly 200 Mb/s.

This article is from the "bad boy" blog, please be sure to keep this source http://5ydycm.blog.51cto.com/115934/1302236