Management myth's rigorous management vs. resilient management

China probably in addition to bat and other leading Internet enterprises, many software companies are still in strict management mode, always treat the elasticity of management as a welfare to see, always in the heart of 10,000 unwilling. The United States software industry is the world's first, flexible management is also the most common way of management, is this the relationship is really because of the high welfare state's sake?

Software industry is a rapidly changing industry, especially the technical aspects of the iteration speed can be said to be the first in the industry, there is no industry replacement speed can be compared to the software industry, which also caused the software industry is not a repetitive work of the industry, take the ERP this very traditional field, An ERP expert no matter how much experience accumulated, each to a new company will have new problems to solve, take big data field, an ERP expert with a just graduated college students that is a starting line, all from the zero start to learn, I have seen in reality that ERP experts in the Big data processing needs in the face of the need to propose creative solutions. Since it is a new problem and a new field, to solve the problem will inevitably avoid the process of trial and error.

The traditional strict management mode is a system that does not allow mistakes, in such a system, in the face of the need to try the wrong to solve the problem of the field, often cause very serious consequences, a try to solve the problem of the wrong employees face strict punishment, the most natural choice is to cover up the problem, And the decision-making leadership will help cover up the problem, forming a cover-up of the wrong interests of the community, the longer the team time will find more and more exclusion can solve the problem of employees, instead of promotion can cover up the problem of staff, standing in the customer's point of view, also will find this company more and more delay, push the ball, The prospect of such a company is very worrying, sadly the boss will only think that employees do not work hard, but management more stringent, into a vicious circle.

In the software industry to cover up the cost of the problem is extremely expensive, if the early recognition is just a trial and error, and then from the beginning to improve, even if the cost of improving several times than the cover-up problem to save more, it is important that the problem has been solved, more than the cost of the problem is not solved.

Flexible management of a series of institutional arrangements, ultimately to allow flexible trial and error, encourage employees to explore the effective way to solve the problem. Now do you still think resilience management is a benefit?

Management myth's rigorous management vs. resilient management