[What can I do if I cannot learn from the past?]-Why is the cooperation in the microcomputer interface experiment?

Experiments are often grouped in class. First, because the school is not equipped enough, we also cultivate our sense of cooperation and ability.

However, there is always such a phenomenon. When a task comes down, everyone will not post their opinions. It will always wait until the fire is imminent, so that most people will do everything by themselves. Then the soy sauce is everywhere.

I don't want to think about why we are so biased towards psychology and sociology. Just think about how I can improve my situation.

Let's talk about this microcomputer interface experiment.

I took a course on the microcomputer interface last semester. I arranged an experiment this semester. Based on a set of experimental instruments, I chose my own questions. Tree and I have a natural group of X. Tree is a kind of less interested in learning. Every time I go to an experiment class, I always say, "I should go back. It's okay here. X is the kind of person who sometimes takes it seriously but sometimes does not work very well. The last time I downloaded Win8 from the machine room, I was speechless. Okay, the question. In the last lesson, I always felt that this was not an issue. Everyone did not do things. I was lucky enough to think that the team members would do things, maybe because they didn't have a division of labor, I just want to share it. One day, I simply thought about it and divided the entire experiment into five parts:

1. Analysis (principles of inclusion)

2. Interface Design

3. flowchart Design

4. Software Framework Design (I mean something similar to what needs to be analyzed and decide what features the software needs)

5. MFC-based software compilation

Divided into 12, 34, 5. I chose neither tree nor X, So I first chose the software design, and then both of them said everything, after a tangle, the final x selects 12 and 34 trees. Good. The division of labor is probably better.

After checking some information, I have a certain understanding of the entire process, and I may have some graphics in my mind. For example, I already have an impression on which Part I need some information, how experiment works, and what functions the program needs. But I don't want to do it by myself. After all, I am a junior. If you have the opportunity to exercise, and if you have another person, it will take a lot of time to do it. Then, isn't the role of the team gone.

I am also worried that what everyone is doing is not the same as what I think. The result is indeed a far cry from what I think. First of all, Xu is more attentive, after all, in theory, it is necessary for him to make a software framework before he can write software. As usual, the tree is always pushed back for various reasons. However, Xu also gave me a headache and was a little speechless, which is quite different from what I thought.

**************************************** **************************************** **************************************** *****

I. Flowchart

 

 

Ii. Software Framework Design

1. Instrument initialization (8255 initialization)

2. LCD displays "Hello world !" Words

3. Check whether the SW button is pressed. After the button SW is pressed, a prompt is displayed for adding the ad, and the SW is automatically restored. If it is not pressed, continue to check.

4. display the ad title on the screen and scroll to the left.

5. Display advertisement image table information

6. Check whether the SW button is pressed. SW repeat Step 3-6 after pressing; if not pressed, the ad title will gradually disappear after static display

7. Check whether sw2 is pressed. If you press it, "Goodbye!" is displayed !" If not, repeat steps 4-6.

8. End

**************************************** **************************************** **************************************** *****

When I first saw it, I thought it was a far cry from what I thought. After reading it carefully, I found that there were also many merits that I did not think, I have also considered some of the problems I have pointed out, and the Child paper is also very modest. However, the software framework design is indeed a bit wrong, or their respective understandings are different. His understanding is to explain the process diagram above, and I want to analyze similar requirements, to facilitate the design of software functions and interfaces. For example, what should the Software Implement? For example, after the running button is pressed, the advertisement is displayed dynamically. If it is more inclined to the programmer, how can the display be written, you also need to have the setting function. You can also set the display time of an advertisement in the setting (start to realize some problems, that is, the advertisement can be rolled and displayed all the time ...).

So my question comes,

1. Do I want to do this: no matter what they do, I have to use what they did in the final lab report without making any changes or just making a few changes.

2. I have an idea during communication, but I am embarrassed to say all my thoughts first, so that they do not feel dispensable. What's more, will my thoughts affect them?

3. For the habitual delay like tree, do I have to wait for him to finish it before the deadline? Shouldn't I interfere with his progress?

4. Do I realize that my parts are not good enough? Isn't communication discussion enough? Do you only learn the content of your own chunks after the chunks, do you need to teach each other later?

Okay. Repeat the problem,

1. division of labor.

Is division of labor good or bad?

From the perspective of the status quo, it is necessary to divide the work of labor. Each of them has something they need to do, and it is indeed faster. For example, Xu has done a good job right away, and their tasks are much less, that fear is also much less.

Is the division of labor freely chosen or assigned?

Let's make a free choice first. If there is no result, we can assign it again. After all, there are no superiors and subordinates.

How should we discuss the division of labor?

Is it determined by one person or by several people? It is better to have a few people decide that one person is not enough to know each other after all. However, there is an organizational problem here.

2. Communication.

When do I need to communicate? When do I need to be independent?

Communication before division of labor is required. If you have another idea, you can also talk about it. However, it seems that it is not good to impose your own ideas on people, and you may not consider yourself weekly. If you think that you are good, others may not give up your suggestions, and you may be guilty, it may also affect the overall quality.

3. Summary and integration.

Without modification, or few modifications?

After all, if my work is abandoned, it will feel bad and chilling? So try not to discard what people make? But speaking of refinement ,....... This is the case first.

Let's talk about this first.