Comments: To reply, but also in the "replies" outside efforts

Luoyang issued a request to all departments to set up the document, request Luoyang Party committees, the Government to arrange for the official login Luoyang Municipal Government website "line" and Luoyang Port "Luoyang City" and other forums, timely download, deal with the problems involved in the department, and set up a professional online response, guidance, replies team.

On the Internet, it is a virtue to look at post replies. For the government's "official website", the people put their own complaints or advisory issues to the above, the effect is tantamount to petition or submit written materials, obviously expect the relevant government departments to give answers and solutions. Therefore, officials look at posts is not only a virtue, but also a kind of "official virtue", a cautious treatment and correct treatment of the masses concerned about the quality of the problem. On the contrary, it is the dereliction of duties in front of people's livelihood.

Luoyang government requests officials to reply or even set up a professional reply team, no doubt can embody the Government's respect for the people's demands, timely response to the people's voice of the original intention; to the refusal to respond to the criticism and other disciplinary measures, will undoubtedly help to combat those who ignore the voice of the "official" However, the joy, I can not help but give birth to a little worry-red-headed forced the people's post is back, do not solve the actual problem?

There is reason to believe that under the pressure of the red-headed, under the power of performance assessment, that is, those who do not usually reply to the habit of officials, will obediently sit in front of the computer to see the post replies. However, the network on the rhetoric easy to write, down-to-earth for the masses of worry-solving problems. In the roaring "reply rate" behind, who can guarantee that all of the replies are taken seriously rather than perfunctory, all the promises will see "below" rather than a bad check, all the people concerned about the problem will be able to communicate with the heart and not on the network with them "cover"?

Yes, we can't guarantee that. It is because, despite the fact that the government agencies that have "only electronic Luoyang" and "upgraded the computer games", the practice is a good governance. However, once the official sitting on the other end of the computer only to see the post as a task must be completed, and unwilling to do it, it is difficult to solve the real life of the specific problems of the people, I am afraid, it is hard to play a role.

In fact, unlike a random response on the Internet, official replies have a natural responsibility and obligation to the Government. And the embodiment of government responsibility and obligation, in the final analysis, will fall to the practical solution of the people's concern. Timely "Reply" is only the prelude to solve the problem, far from the ground for the people. Therefore, in the dispatch of the relevant departments at the same time, more should be blocked officials "replies but not as" behavior space. After all, what the public needs is not a response on the web, but a government that "speaks and acts".