How to be a fool

If you can agree that the world is mainly composed of dummies, we should be able to accept the following series of less rigorous Inferences:

Things that are fashionable usually belong to the world of dummies; =>

Non-dummies will certainly do some uncommon things; =>

To break away from the dummies sequence, you need to do the less common things described.

The above statement cannot deduce the following conclusion:

1. Non-dummies must not do common things.

Generally, there are many things that must be done by an individual. Naturally, they also include dummies. For example, eating, sleeping, breathing ...... You know.

2. Doing anything unusual will definitely mean you are out of the dummies.

Some extremely rare behaviors, such as streaking without reason, will be regarded as a fool by fools. This is a tragedy. Dummies will further distinguish a certain type of people in their own world and think that such people are dummies, not themselves. According to this description, from a mathematical point of view, we should be unable to break away from the dummies sequence. I will not prove it. Or to be more accurate, the purpose of this article is to allow you to draw a larger scope of dummies, and you are not in it. In addition to the first time, you should be able to find that there will be a small collection and you will still be a dummies. Therefore, this kind of pathological function is basically the same as that of continuous immutations. The vast majority of dummies do not do things, but they do things that very few dummies do. Remember.

Below I will start to list some things that I think will likely expand the scope of your definition of dummies, and you can also exclude yourself.

 

First, let's look at Chinese Wikipedia and even make a contribution. Wikipedia is a well-known project. Among the ten most visited websites in the world, this website is not driven by commercial interests. With this one, you will find out how valuable this site is.

 

But isn't that what most people do? It is true from the perspective of the world, but it is not the same in the Chinese version. Let's take a look at the statistics on the number of content in Wikipedia in various major languages: the number of Chinese characters ranks 12th, english, German, French, Italian, Polish, Japanese, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Russian, and Swedish. Swedish ...... That's right, the country's biggest enemy is not such a small language. Based on the per capita ownership, Chinese Wikipedia basically shows that our national culture is a desert state. The Swedish population is less than 10 million, and the number of entries in Swedish Wikipedia is about 0.38 million. That is to say, each person has approximately 0.038 entries. The Chinese population is 1.3 billion. I am too lazy to count as Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and overseas Chinese. The number of entries in Chinese Wikipedia is about 0.36 million, that is, each person has 0.000277 entries, it is one of 137 points in Sweden. The number of Wikipedia entries in Japan is 0.00573, which is also 20 times that of us. This is a gloomy figure than per capita GDP, so our per capita GDP is also a tenth of Japan's.

 

Some people will mention Baidu encyclopedia, but I am quite disgusted, because there is no reference in the content, and no one will review whether there is any infringement problem. In many cases, you cannot confirm whether the content in Baidu encyclopedia is trustworthy. Wikipedia is much better in this regard. First, the infringing content will be reviewed and deleted, and then there will be prompts for the lack of referenced content. Baidu encyclopedia has many other problems. If you have been on Wikipedia for a long time, you will certainly understand it.

 

Wikipedia is actually quite interesting. For example, do you know that some proteins make you think sour things are sweet? For example, do you know the jolt award? Which books and products have won the jolt award?

 

(To be continued)