In the post-pandatv era, where are security vendors?

The smog of "pandatv burning incense" gradually dispersed with the arrival of the year of pig, although no one dared to ensure that it would be revived, but at least people have time to calm down and remember this "war ". While people compete to discuss whether Li Jun is a talented person or scum, our netizens should not only review their own In addition to negligence, we should look at network security software vendors that have experienced the "baptism" of panda.com, I don't know how these domestic anti-virus vendors will face the new situation after the death of a few moleheaded boys, because when the pandatv leaves, the moxiong or the Bear Dog will come sooner or later.

 

You don't have to listen to Mao Zong's "No need to ring the bell for people to undo" and do not have to worry about the fox mentality of "extremely low pandatv technology, it is not necessary to analyze the philosophy that "damage is greater than repair. No matter how many battles are being played, the "defeat" is the fact that the security vendors have to face.

Although pandatv is not a symbolic milestone virus, it is, after all, the country's first climate-based virus, therefore, it seems that the future cannot be called in the Post-pandatv era. In the "post-pandatv" era, where will our anti-virus software go? What issues should they consider?

First, piracy.

In the face of the surging volume of piracy, many problems deserve our consideration. One fact we must face is that there is almost no piracy and soft removal concept in foreign countries. The real world's first-line security vendors (not the ones we commonly use to kill soft production, even the well-known Kabbah is only a second-line international manufacturer, even if its technology is first-class)CAAnd other manufacturers, their personal security software is completely free, because their financial source is mainly enterprises. Therefore, the CAS have invested more energy in the technical development of enterprises, in order to obtain profits far from the individual market. However, some domestic manufacturers are struggling with anti-piracy and lose the opportunity to enter enterprise users.

We are always surprised: the trend of anti-virus in the personal market is far inferior to domestic products, but it is Yahoo's darling; NOD32 is far inferior to its reputation, but it isMicrosoftCA's domestic agent vendors are exceptionally weak, but Ca is the second largest software vendor in the world. The reason is that the concept is different. Rather than asking users to find ways to use pirated versions with vulnerabilities, they should be able to use them free of charge. Although they have lost profits in the personal market, they can save their anti-piracy efforts to gain more profits. Do you know the profits a medium enterprise user can earn? However, Chinese enterprises do not care about this. Their Anti-Piracy technology is far higher than the security technology. It is a good test of the old saying that "I picked up sesame seeds and lost watermelon.

We may not understand why Kabbah is always bluffing to block piracy, but there is no "real trick". The real reason is that it requires a large number of samples from pirated users to report the virus to expand its virus database, most genuine users are cainiao.

What should we do with piracy?

2. Concepts and technologies.

The concept of hot hyping has little significance and is highly expected.Rising"Virtual Machine anti-virus" Technology is not powerful enough to "terrorism" to the face of pandatv is vulnerable, but some of the old "signature" on behalf of Kaspersky has some strength to fight back. The best performance in pandatv's campaign was that many people were stunned at the beginning (but even scared and even learned by many people) active Defense software-micropoints (even if there are factors to boast ).

This makes people have to ask: Is pattern code, virtual machines, and active defense the end of a new concept, or is it the beginning of a new technology? Is it possible for them to stand together, or should they eventually achieve the same goal? The concept and technology problems should be deeply thought-provoking in the network security field, where "hold" and "kill" are prevalent.

Third, whether it is low-end or high-end.

No matter how rising and Kabbah confront each other, no one can deny the "low-end" of domestic security vendors. The reason why foreign vendors are dismissive to domestic manufacturers is that they think that the domestic stuff is not "Grade" enough. Because of the excessive pursuit of virtual names, domestic manufacturers are keen on application-layer products, while reducing their energy spent on basic technology research, they can no longer develop high-end products, there is no way to have a positive impact on the enhancement of your own strength, which forms a vicious circle.

The vendor only knows how much and how much we know about high or low things such as shelling, signatures, and virtual machines.

Like other industries, low-end and high-end trade-offs are also a problem that security vendors must face. Do they want to "live" or survive?

In short, ideas and technologies are always the most important in any era. It doesn't matter if you're not playing the game. It's the truth to use the technologies that your opponents admire. Advanced technologies and concepts should be considered by Chinese anti-virus vendors in the "Post-pandatv" era. (People's Network)