Interview-you know

□If the other party says, "Your experience is too simple, but we need people with rich social experience ."
■ You can smile and answer: "I'm sure that if I join your company, I will soon become a person with rich social experience. I hope I have such an experience ."
□If the other party says, "You are too introverted, I am afraid this is not suitable for our profession ."
■ You can smile and answer: "It is said that introverted people often have a dedicated and persevering quality. In addition, I am good at listening because I feel that I should leave more opportunities for others to speak ."
□If the other party says, "We need graduates from famous universities, you are not a graduate from famous universities ."
■ You can say humorously: "I heard that Bill Gates has not graduated from Harvard University ."
□If the other party says, "How is your major different from the position applied ?"
■ You can cleverly answer: "It is said that compound talents are the most popular in the 21 st century, and layers may be inspired by more experts because they have no mindset or rules ."

If the other party says, "Your original unit is so good, but you have to leave, isn't it necessary to move your nest when the original unit is not mixed up ?" If you are stuttering, speechless, or angry, and strive to blushing your neck, you will fall into the trap set by the other party. When a candidate encounters such a situation, he must be calm-minded and understand that the other party is "playing" without competing with him.

A challenging language trap. This type of question is characterized by starting from the weakest position of a job seeker.

For recent graduates, the interviewer will ask, "What do you think about your lack of relevant work experience ?" For female college students, the interviewer may ask: "women often lack confidence in their abilities. What do you think ?" If you have already fallen into the trap, because what the other party wants to hear is your opinion on this issue, rather than a simple and blunt counterargument.
For such a problem, you can use "such a statement may not be all right", "such a view is worth exploring", and "such a statement has some truth, but I am afraid I cannot accept it completely. "This is the opening remarks, and then I politely express my different opinions.

The interviewer sometimes asks questions about which pot is not too open or too embarrassing. For example, "your academic performance is not very good. What is the problem ?" "From the Perspective of your resume, if you have not worked as a student cadre during college, will this affect your work ability?" and so on.
When such a problem occurs, some job seekers tend to defend themselves, or even kill back each other. In this way, we will only mistakenly fall into the trap of over-confidence and lead to the Evaluation of "arrogant. The best way to answer this question should be not to conceal and avoid it, but not to be too straightforward. The best way to answer this question should be to bypass it in a clever way.
For example, when the other party says that your academic performance is not very good, you can admit it and analyze the reasons to bring out your other advantages. For example, the reason why my academic performance is not very good at school is that I am the owner of the community and have invested too much energy in community activities. Although the painstaking efforts I spent in the community have also brought me a lot of gains, but the academic performance is not the best, these 1.1 just let me worry. After realizing this, I have been trying to correct my own deviations.

Michael, who had won several victories during the interview, had such an interview. Michael's academic performance was not top-notch. During the interview, this was the key to the examiner's attack: "Your score seems not outstanding. How do you prove your learning ability ?"
Michael was not in a hurry: "I have other activities besides learning. Not only the score can reflect the learning ability of a person. In fact, my professional courses are quite good. If you have any questions, you can test my professional knowledge on the spot ." Michael cleverly bypasses embarrassing questions and directs the examiner's attention to his best professional knowledge.

Inductive language traps. This type of question is characterized by the fact that the interviewer often sets a specific background condition to induce the other party to make a wrong answer, because either of the answers may not satisfy the other party. At this time, your answer needs to be expressed in fuzzy language.

For example, "depending on your current level, I am afraid you can find a company that is better than ours ?"
If your answer is "yes", it means that you may be on two ships and "in Cao camp ". If you answer "no", it means you lack confidence in yourself or have problems with your abilities.
For such questions, you can start with "cannot generalize" and then answer: "Maybe I can find a better company than your company, but other companies may not pay more attention to talent training than your company, there are not as many opportunities as your company. Maybe I can find a better company. I think it is most important to cherish what I already have."
In fact, you threw a "fuzzy" answer to the interviewer.

There is also an inductive language trap: the question of the other party seems to be a single-choice question. If you select it, it will fall into the trap. For example, the other party asks, "Which one do you think is important to money, reputation, and career ?"

These three are of course important to newly graduated college students. However, the other party's questions mislead you and make you think that "these three are mutually contradictory and you can only choose one of them ". At this time, we should not fall into the trap of the other party. We must analyze it calmly. We can first clearly point out that this precondition does not exist, and then explain the importance and uniformity of the three to us.
You can organize the language like this: "I don't think there is any conflict between the three. As a college student with higher education, the pursuit of career success is of course the main melody of his life. The way in which society can affirm our career is sometimes money, reputation, or both. Therefore, I believe that we should acquire money and reputation in the process of pursuing our career. All three of them are important to us ."

Similarly, there is a misleading trap. The interviewer has an answer, but deliberately says the opposite. If you follow the incorrect answer of the interviewer, the interview conclusion must be: this person has no opinion and lacks the spirit of innovation. It is naturally listed as the elimination column.

There is also a testing language trap. This type of question is characterized by a fictitious situation that allows job seekers to answer. For example, "how do you prove that you are the best candidate for nearly 10 candidates in the interview today ?" This type of problem often refers to the ability of job seekers to adapt to the situation. No matter how many advantages you list for yourself, there are always advantages you may not have. Therefore, it is meaningless to answer such questions positively. You can answer this question from the front.

You can answer: "For this reason, it may be due to specific circumstances. For example, what your company needs now is administrative talents, I am confident that my experience as a student cadre and a community member has laid a solid foundation for me, this is what I think is more prominent." Such an answer can be said to be smooth, and it is difficult for the other party to grasp the handle and fight back again.
Sometimes, the interviewer asks the following question: "Do you like or hate trivial work? Why ?"
This is a dilemma. If you like the answer, it seems to be contrary to the actual psychology of the current Intellectual Youth. If you hate it, it seems that every job is trivial. Therefore, in general psychology, people do not want to do trivial work (unless they have special posts, such as hourly work in the family). That is, when the examiner asks, we can infer that they are drunk, but in "work attitude ".
We can express our attitude in this way. "trivial things are inevitable in most jobs. If there are trivial things that need to be done in my work, I will do it carefully, patiently, and meticulously."
This sentence not only euphemistically expresses the General Psychology of most people-they do not like trivial work, but also emphasize their professionalism in trivial matters-earnest, patient, and meticulous. It is both authentic and trustworthy, and conforms to the employing psychology of the other party.

Among the various language traps, the most difficult and dangerous are possible language traps.

For example, if you apply for a position as a company's financial manager, the interviewer may suddenly ask you: "as a financial manager, if I (general manager) what do you do if you require tax evasion of 1 million RMB within one year?" If you are scratching your ears on the spot or listing a large number of tax evasion schemes immediately, you will be caught in the trap. The interviewer who throws this question tests your business judgment and business ethics. Keep in mind that compliance with laws and regulations is the most basic requirement for employee behavior.
For example, you are about to switch from one company to another. The interviewer asked you, "Is it difficult for your boss to get along with each other? Otherwise, why did you change jobs ?" Maybe his guess is exactly why you want to change jobs. Even so, remember not to be confused by this tone of sympathy, or to climb up the pole. If you attack your boss angrily or complain about your company with indignation, you must be done, because it not only exposes your intolerance, but also exposes your narrow.