It's not a Windows fault, because money is causing trouble.

It's not a Windows fault, because money is causing trouble.

I ran into an article on the Internet just now. I guess Windows Vista will contain Visual Studio 2005 Express. After seeing this, my first feeling is: Cut, how is it possible? Why is it integrated with media player? Is it intended to promote universal programming?

Next, the article points out that any Linux/Unix system contains a simple development environment (I thought about it, too !) Therefore, Windows has deviated from the operating system spirit. When I saw this, I felt my scalp was tight-I was already poisoned. There are at least two performances:

1. I just thought it would be quite normal not to integrate Visual Studio 2005 Express.
2. The concept "compiler is a system software and a part of the operating system" has never been formed in my mind-the reason is that I made a big splash on the Windows platform. Think about the cousin and sister who are still immersed in Windows in college. I really want to tell them-Don't feel bad about the fake Word documents and Excel Data! Install "have a head" first!

So why does M $ refuse to integrate Visual Studio 2005 express into Vista? I have analyzed the following reasons:

1. There are legal issues. The integration of IE and media player has overwhelmed M $. If Visual Studio is integrated, it is estimated that Borland and other companies will immediately turn to M $. In addition, it is not ruled out that Visual Studio uses the technology of other companies-your free integration is a free thing, and other companies still collect money based on Beibei-M $ is not silly.
2. Linux/UNIX operating systems are free of charge and free of charge. I am not doing well, and people will not scold me. For example, most Linux systems are not fully localized, and some of the systems always retain their development native language-the compiling environment and IDE are generally in English. But windows doesn't work. It is charged for money and disaster recovery. How can we release products that are not fully localized? In fact, the localization project of Vista itself is already huge, and versions in dozens of languages are to be released, if Visual Studio is also localized into dozens of languages (don't forget to bring the simplified version of msdn), and it is free-unless Vista's project manager is clever.
3. Visual Studio 2005 Express can be perfectly downloaded and installed without any effort. Most Windows users don't need it anyway. Why bother yourself?

In the final analysis, it is for money.