Job 7: User Experience design case study

Appendix 1. UX Design Evaluation Criteria

2. Give users timely and quick feedback;
4. interface conforms to convention;
6. User control rights (master);
8. Consistency and standardization;
10. Suitable for all types of users (not absolute);
12. Help users to troubleshoot software defects;
14. Necessary tips and help documentation;

Satisfaction 1. Can give users a quick feedback, basic seconds back

2. User control is still very large, the user has a lot of choices

3. Basically suitable for students of all colleges

4. There are a number of useful ways to push back in teaching

Not satisfied 1. The interface is not customary, basically most public numbers have a navigation menu, allowing users to choose, user-friendly operation, and the educational system needs to send arbitrary information, and then its

will give a hint, from the user's point of view, obviously there is more friendly navigation (, one for the educational system of the public number, the other is the public number of the Institute )

2. The limitations of the public number itself, as the public number of a teaching system, its two most important function one is the result inquiry, the other is the public elective course registration, does not register in the public elective course and checks the result

Peak, the public number is basically idle. While the public elective course registration, the system is very easy to paralysis. Some of the people who push attention are still very few,

3. Query empty classrooms This function also has Other software can be implemented, such as many college students in the super timetable, because not only can query empty classrooms, but also to see the timetable, the number of people instead of more

Job 7: User experience design case study