I have been in many communities, and have witnessed a lot of things, one of which has been a headache for moderators, that is popular. Want to let popular better, it seems to be two choices, one is to draw money to advertise, the second is to pull some people stir. The former invests more, the latter invests less. However, today is not a mention of these.
The Forum pays attention to the mutual communication and the communication, if cannot exchange and the communication, also even if does not have the real sense forum. When the moderator has an unwritten rule, is to often back to the post, no matter how you feel about yourself, but you can not reply. Because through the reply, may let the Netizen understand some questions: for example, you are online now, such as you do not have a shelf, such as you see someone else's work, and so on, I have because of the reply to the altar friend's post, and let them grateful, special message or e-mail to me, I think this is very abnormal phenomenon, but also very bitter, When the moderator should develop back to the habit of the post, should be counted in the matter, if you have to ask others to reply, this is the moderator's failure.
Yes, today is to ponder this reply, I repeatedly think and argument, improve the situation of the Forum is a way to reply, but not only is the moderator reply, but we all reply, in a number of at the same time, pay close attention to quality! As long as the post as a matter, learning to observe and research forum, can be found that many forums are now a common problem, that is, lack of response, there is a lack of high-quality response. Because of the lack of reply, affect the mood of the user posts. Who would like to see the posts hang out there, from the top of the page to the bottom?
Each post has always had the click Rate, but the reply to the post is very few, this is not just a moderator of the problem, but the whole community problem. The reader of the post is subdivided according to certain standards, and can easily draw the following conclusions: 1, a passer-by. 2, Bubble altar net friend. 3, management personnel.
The question of passing by, I have in the past to a community webmaster comments on the emphasis on the key to this problem is transformation, every forum and even the community have a lot of netizens belong to the traveler, that is, there is no clear purpose, but just slip and turn, point to see, but lazy to express their views. As we these people, through what method can add a new traveler at the same time, can also transform the old traveler into the bubble altar netizens, mobilize them as spectators of the participation enthusiasm, the whole forum will be in the original foundation on the previous steps. Because this part of the net friend although transformation difficulty is big, but if transforms the good instead has a huge impetus. (hastily passing the question, it is worth every forum management personnel's reflection, can not effectively solve the problem of hasty passing, the forum can not change the qualitative change)
Bubble Altar Netizen problem, someone has made it clear to me that irrigation can solve the problem of popularity, I think this formulation is inaccurate, the classification of irrigation is more, if just return two sentences in the back, but not seriously read the author's work, this reply except let people know you exist, it seems no other role, itself is not respect for the author. When we write things, there are some readers who will pay attention to it, and also, if one day they write something, will we share the same concern?
In the appearance of the works, I have repeatedly stressed that the main original, many reprint of course is necessary, but also to be sure, but I also hope that more people to join the original, you do not say to me that you do not write well, you just know thousands of characters, you can write articles, you do not try, try and can not insist, How can we keep improving?
Also said moderator, I often feel the meager strength of the individual, I am not a professional moderator, there is no subsidy; I am not a public money internet, everything is arbitrary; I'm not carefree, I don't have to worry about anything. I am only a person who pays for the internet, but I will try my best to do it in a day's net. "This world has not failed, only give up!" "I've always thought so.