We have been trying to avoid reflecting on ourselves by proving others' problems. I forgot my initial intention)

Hello everyone, today's video is irrelevant to the evaluation. Before zealer enters the next stage, I hope to give a serious and honest explanation to all our friends who care about us. The live broadcast debate in August 27 poses an unprecedented challenge to zealer and myself. The original purpose of the video debate is to openly and transparently explore the problems of T1 products and the zealer testing method. Unfortunately, I did not have many opportunities to fully express our views.

In our reflection afterwards, we found ourselves falling into a huge mindset trap-we have been trying to avoid reflecting on ourselves by proving others' problems. I forgot my initial heart and the value and mission of zealer. Until we suddenly realized that changing and improving ourselves is the most important thing.

Therefore, the most important content in today's video is that we represent all the members of zealer and sincerely apologize for the mistakes we have made throughout the incident.

First, we apologize for the technical errors and language expression errors in the T1 evaluation video, such as descriptions of internal switches, logo technology, and Electrostatic Protection of the fuselage, it will lead to serious deviations in the understanding of this product. Such errors should not occur for a team that is evaluated as a professional.

Secondly, we must apologize for the inaccuracy in the video footage and the possible misleading reasons. The video concluded that the video angle is based on the test results of the darkroom. When the video is taken, the beauty of the camera is given priority and the rigor is ignored. Zealer's evaluation video is a serious comment. In terms of video material shooting methods, it is necessary to ensure the strictest degree of rigor in expression rather than the visual aesthetic.

Third, I would like to apologize to my friends who have always supported zealer. Everyone has always given us the greatest tolerance and support on zealer's growth path, however, we failed to keep our mission in mind throughout the entire process and failed to fulfill our expectations.

Finally, as the team leader, I would like to apologize to every member of zealer, who have made great efforts in both evaluation and preparation of the debate, however, my poor performance did not completely express everyone's efforts, causing great losses to zealer.

However, I am most saddened by the loss of zealer's "credibility", which is the basis of our existence. In conclusion, the voices discussed by everyone are centered on several aspects.

1. "objective, independent, and third-party"

Since the birth of zealer, these three tags have followed us closely. When we accept the financing from mobile phone manufacturers, we feel that we are not worthy of carrying these three tags, so today we decided to remove them.

What we can ensure is that in the future evaluation, objective and real data are measured, and the evaluation must be based on zealer attitude. At the same time, we willAdd "interest-related" descriptions to prominent locations on the websiteTo explain the situation of zealer investors. The same content will be added to the video. I firmly believe that as long as we move in the direction of determination, one day, objective, independent, and third parties will surely return to zealer.

Ii. Consultation

The original intention of zealer's consulting service in 2013 was to help manufacturers discover product deficiencies from the user's perspective before going public. At the same time, we also hope that our suggestions on the product can be reflected in a substantial way.

However, today, the voice of everyone proves that our past decisions were not well considered, so we decidedThe consulting service has been fully suspended today.. In the future, we will continue to launch the service in the form of free services or not, which will be decided later.

Third, about fix

To fix this business, we will continue to purchase the best accessories in the market through legal channels, because our goal is very simple, that is, to provide users with reliable and high-quality services.

The above is what zealer wants to change after it goes through, but the goal of zealer to restore the essence of technology will not change! Both fix, ask, and the upcoming zealer lab will closely focus on this long-term goal.

The reputation of a brand is never formed overnight. Similarly, the accumulation of credibility is never achieved overnight. Next, we will focus most of our time on how to improve our own problems. We hope that our efforts will make zealer more open, transparent, and humble.

We lost in the debate. This was accepted when I stepped out of the studio. Although we lost the debate, we did not lose the future. For zealer at present, T1's objective problems are far beyond our scope of attention. After we planned to update a few more videos, we hope to have a rest period to prepare for the coming new stage. But now we need to advance this plan, I hope to be with our team to sum up the experience we have learned during this period, listen to their voices, and reflect on my own weaknesses in personality and behavior as a decision maker, explore the space we can improve as a team executes.

This is the most serious trust crisis zealer has experienced since its establishment. People will always have the right to question and retain their opinions, so please do not believe what we say today, time will be the best proof.

Soon, we will start again!

We have been trying to avoid reflecting on ourselves by proving others' problems. I forgot my initial intention)