What does IBM mean by buying Sun for MySQL?

PHPChina info: IfIBMSuccessful acquisitionSun,DatabaseFor the market, this is really an interesting thing. Let's sort out this rumor before we discuss it further. This transaction is still a rumor. Although it is reported that it may come true in the next few days, it may not be discussed. This is the current speculation. The response of this transaction far exceeds the effect of Sun's components. The latter includes a contractedServerBusiness, perhaps Sun's most obvious asset.

Because IBM can clone this database through the quick release of the DB2 databaseTechnologyMany people question why IBM needsMySQLWhat about it? DanaGardner, chief analyst at Interarbor Solutions LLC, is also one of them. He believes that for IBM, there is no reasonBasicFurther expandOpen SourceBecause IBM now runs DB2 very well. If they want to further open-source their database strategies, they do not need to purchase Sun for this purpose; they can purchase Ingres or separate an open-source version from DB2.

Forrester analyst NoelYuhanna expressed different opinions. MySQL has a client cache, which is not suitable for other open-source databases. In addition, MySQL has more benefits than other open-source databases-up to $0.4 billion in revenue at most. Although he points out that this number is applicable to databasesSoftwareFor the entire market revenue of $16 billion, 0.4 billion is a small number, but this number is still considerable. MySQL will provide IBM with an opportunity to provide replacement databases to customers seeking open source databases. In the current economic situation, companies are more eager to look at the open source database market than ever before, because they all want to reduce costs, while MySQL is very mature in terms of technology, so they all aim for opportunities to become larger and better.Performance.

Many customers regard DB2 as a major database.WindowsAndLinuxThe strong growth of this database was not achieved. If you carefully look at the combination of the exchange, you will find that this is a good choice for IBM.

Curt Monash, an analyst at the Monash research company, agreed that we have no reason to think that IBM will abandon MySQL or other DBMS products.

Yuhanna added that Sun failed to operate MySQL services only because of the lack of service migration and high-end database tools. Many Forrester customers have pointed out that Sun has never been able to improve MySQL performance and scale. If they cannot provide good support for high-end databases, they will worry that customers will no longer use MySQL.

Renaissance MySQL may be the most competitive competitor of Microsoft SQL Server and its recently acquired DATAllegro, which is gaining more trust from high-end databases, including business intelligence and data warehousing.

However, Yuhanna believes that. NET customers prefer SQL servers and their reasons are also obvious, especially in the presentMicrosoftChanging yourArchitectureIt is more closely connected with tools than ever before. This is what IBM wants to break.JavaAnd MySQL provide a fusion point to make it more attractive to customers.