Where is the technical content of the game test?

I am currently doing a web game webgame test, joined a web game Test QQ Group. The average group message less than 50 per day, whenever there is news, but also for security testing, performance testing, stress testing, automated testing and so on tools. But no one has responded.

Is this 4-piece test really the core value of the game test? So that when I put forward "only functional testing and better do functional testing, do not need these tools", the group has a small boiling, most people think: manual testing has no technical content, has been doing manual testing is the degradation of the performance.

The tool is secondary, I think, the key is to consider what you want to use the tool to achieve what effect, and then consider the most effective tool to achieve the effect of what is not blindly pursuit of "technical content." This kind of consciousness and this kind of ability, is the game Test personnel's "technical content" place.

AAA 14:58:18
Who has the game Security Test tool AH.
Can you send me one?

BBB 14:58:47
I want one, too.

Ox also likes 15:43:46
There's a pair of hands.
You want.

CCC 15:44:16

。。。

BBB 15:44:22
You're going to have to chop your hands off.

Ox also likes 15:46:27
Are you already doing the Web game test, and why do I have a tool that doesn't work?

CCC 15:46:52
Me,too

DDD 15:47:35
Ditto

Ox also likes 15:51:09
What safety tests, performance tests, stress tests, nothing

Some are functional testing, and how to better perform functional testing

CCC 15:54:03
Alas...

Ox also likes 15:54:37
I also measured a webgame product. There is nothing wrong with that, we also invite more advice

AAA 15:54:46
Real words
Share

CCC 15:55:23
No technical content, feel

AAA 15:55:34
Oh, yes
Long working hours

Ox also likes 15:56:00
I think, to be pragmatic, and not to pursue empty so-called technical content

CCC 15:57:16
How pragmatic. Continue the manual test.

Ox also likes 15:58:12
Better use existing tools, try new tools or homemade tools, but don't focus on this

CCC 15:58:37
What are your existing tools?
The game test doesn't seem to be using any tools.

Ox also likes 16:03:15
Defect management tools, use case management tools
Time management tools, task management tools

CCC 16:04:16
Have you been exposed to it?

Ox also likes 16:06:02
Bugzilla,bugfree
Excel
Project

Ox also likes 16:06:41
There are version control tools, test server build Tools

SVN securecrt

Ox also likes 16:09:23
The tool is secondary, I think, the key is to consider what you want to use the tool to achieve what effect, and then consider the most effective tool to achieve the effect of what
Rather than pursue "technical content"

Ox also likes 16:11:08
I also used the key wizard test, also write shell script. But they just got their fur on their hands.

With LoadRunner. The learning cost is high, so it's not as good as the button elf

BBB 16:11:37
That's not bad, I didn't use it.

AAA 16:11:54
I didn't use it either.
Do you have any study materials?

FFF 16:12:20
I've heard it, but I haven't used it.
Can be put into the share not.

Ox also likes 16:13:07
Search
I did not study materials, self-study, groping, thinking

BBB 16:13:21
I have the LR information.

It's a lot of information, but I haven't seen it.
I'll pass it on to share.

Ox also likes 16:15:07

Who uses LR to measure webgame, share under test effect?

I just test the effect, not the method.