Why are open-source systems slow?

Why are open-source systems slow? -- Linux general technology-Linux technology and application information. For details, refer to the following section. I once read such a post on the Internet. The original Article is as follows.

Women are like the operating system. The worst women are DOS and Windows 95. They have neither a beautiful appearance nor powerful strength. A man who takes such a woman as a wife can only shed tears in his heart. Although such a woman wants to do something for a man, she can only feel her balance. A better female is like Windows 98 and Windows ME. Although they are not beautiful, they still have the ability to meet the needs of men. Such a wife and man will recognize them.

Most female now look pretty, but not affordable and charming, like Windows XP. In less than a few months after marriage, I get bored with my life and start to strike slowly. As a result, a man can only spend his time in patience. When the man is really impatient, there is only one way left: Change-start again!

Some women, like Vista, are absolutely beautiful and capable! But let most men stop looking at it. If you are eager to try it, don't worry about memory fees if you don't have powerful hardware to back it up! Before the appearance of a perfect operating system, the man who knows the philosophy of life should choose Windows 2000 and Linux, which have a good appearance and good performance.

It can be seen that Linux is a good system in the eyes of many people, with beautiful appearance and good performance. Due to its good stability, Linux is widely used in server operating systems.

However, since the birth of Linux, Linux has never been a rival to Windows. Why?

I personally think that the main reason is not that Linux itself is inferior to Windows, but that there are too few cross-platform applications. A computer serves only two people, working or entertaining. From the perspective of work, most tool software mainly considers Windows as a platform during design and development. In terms of games, games that can run on Linux systems are rarely seen.

Therefore, Windows is popular, most of which is because almost all PC desktops are Windows. This is like buying a house. Everyone wants to find a house with complete surrounding facilities, convenient transportation and close to the city center. Therefore, if Linux is to be popular, it is not a job of open-source system vendors. All software developers must be involved. If Linux is always in the "don't scream" situation, it will still be popularized.

The second aspect is Microsoft's market strategy. The market of this enterprise is really doing very well. Theoretically speaking, the transition from Windows XP to Vista is a dangerous process. Vista's resource consumption and its own prices are all factors hindering its promotion. However, in Microsoft's publicity campaign, almost no one wants to change their operating system to Linux? Kaiyuan system manufacturers do not have so much money to operate in the market, so they have to use anti-monopoly law to resist Microsoft.

The third aspect is my personal thoughts. It is widely recognized that Linux is more stable than Windows, but will this situation continue? Microsoft will release new patches every once in a while, which makes us feel like Microsoft is always suffering. However, we all know that software without bugs cannot exist. An operating system will certainly have vulnerabilities, but they are just issues that people have not discovered. Nowadays, as a mainstream operating system, Windows is the operating system that many hackers study. I don't know how many computer experts are watching Windows, if we put an open-source system like Linux on such a "Storm", I don't know how much stability Linux can continue. In other words, if Linux becomes a mainstream operating system and attracts the attention of many hackers, will such an open-source system still be stable? If Linux is compared to a woman, who can put such an "open" woman at home safely?

Even if all the programmers in the world have come to perfect such an operating system, we all know that it is much easier to destroy the original architecture, just as it takes several years for a tree to grow into a towering tree, however, it takes only a few minutes to hack it.

This is just my personal opinion. (Hello husband)