Why C # half and Java 8 gram

There is no difference in tea, but there are different people drinking tea. martial arts is not high or low, but it is the skill of the martial arts; ---- This Is The refutation of Jet Li in the movie "horjuna" about the high and low martial arts of the Japanese samurai. It makes sense. Similarly, there is no distinction between high and low languages. The difference is that you know the language before the screen.
A language is better than another language. It is better to say that one language is more suitable for the field you work in, or "you" is more familiar with this language.
I think there is only one field of language, and there is no difference between high and low, but sometimes it manufacturers' business strategies will also affect the language audience.
What is language? I think the language itself is too narrow. It is not just an expression that has its own syntax. As a language, it should include at least three aspects: semantics, syntax, and pragmatic. These are not technologies, but human thoughts. Can you say that the semantics of C # is better than that of Java, or that Java is clearer than that of C? If the answer comes out, it's just a battle!

All comparisons against a language technique itself are incorrect.
You have to use Ada to write a ticket booking system for the Expo, and then say nothing about Ada, not even a button. Does this make sense? Six of us are using it!

For example, for ASP, you may agree that ASP. NET is a transcendence. If you think so, you still do not know the technology from a higher perspective! It, it, why put "I" before "T", a broad understanding of the technology that can generate value is a good technology, Asp. net advances in technology and cannot be used. NET platform for small enterprises, ASP is the first choice, a set based on. NET platform system? It may soon catch up with the output of small enterprises in a year! For them, ASP is better than ASP. net is a better technical language. A friend who opened a company asked me a few days ago, oh, why are you still using ASP. net, our company has changed ASP for a long time. It is very practical! For them, it is enough to see the interface implementation process. For you in front of the screen, you feel a great risk. You have different positions and naturally have different feelings!

You think Java is more relevant to your enterprise value because you don't know that C # is backed by TFS, Visual Studio, the official framework, and simple programming.

You think C # is more advanced than Java, because you didn't see struts and EJB have a strong influence on java.

For modern software engineering, measuring a language should not be compared from its technical perspective. It is more inappropriate to stand on its language characteristics. The language characteristics are just syntactic sugar, or the so-called "standard" and "special effects" in a certain scenario, under a certain requirement, or under a certain cooperation mode. Other languages do not do this, it does not impede the implementation of people. I personally think that the future of a language is determined by the architecture, professionalism, industry framework, and charm of the language itself. The following practices are of little significance:
1. over-emphasizing the processing mechanism of a language for things under certain circumstances;
2. Compare the syntax features of a language to solve a problem;
3. Cross-Industry or demand type comparison Language
4. Comparison of language Implementation ideas
Last point: language is only divided into fields, and there is no difference between high and low.