18 bottles of fake Maotai drink a bottle double compensation

This newspaper in the restaurant to drink when the fake Maotai, Mr. Ho for "fake" and a breath to buy 17 bottles.　　In the relevant departments identified 17 bottles are false drink, Mr Ho will be the hotel court request double compensation. Reporter learned in the morning, the court found Mr. Ho know to buy fake, this is not consumer personal consumption behavior, so the decision hotel returned 17 bottles of fake Maotai.　　But for Mr. Ho to drink the 1 bottles of fake Maotai, the hotel decided to double compensation. October 31, 2010, Mr. Ho and his friends came to the Haidian District Maurin Hotel to eat, drink a bottle of 1488 yuan 53 degrees Guizhou flying Maotai. During the meal, Mr. Ho bought 17 bottles of wine and sent them to the business sector for identification.　　After identification, these wines are false wine. Gong to the hotel inspection found that the hotel still contains fake Maotai.　　Subsequently, Mr. Ho will sue the hotel to the court, asking the other party double compensation for 18 bottles of drinks a total of 53,000 yuan.　　When the case was heard, Mr Ho had said that he had found the wine to be a false wine at the time of his meal, and bought 17 bottles in order to "fight against the Counterfeit". Court hearing that, 18 bottles of fake Maotai, only the 1 bottles of wine consumed by consumers for life needs of consumer behavior, the court supports the "back one loss one."　　The remainder does not belong to personal consumption behavior and does not support double compensation.　　The judge reminded the Haidian Court Judge Tang Ying, said, "Elimination Law" stipulates that the operator to sell false goods constitute fraud, the consumer needs to double compensation. The punitive compensation system protects the interests of consumers.　　And the consumer, is refers to for the life needs buys, uses the commodity or accepts the service the individual. In this case, Mr Ho's drink is a loss of consumer rights and may require double compensation.　　However, he is still buying after knowing that the goods are false, and is to profit by other people's illegal activities, which is not a reasonable exercise of rights and should not be supported by law. Tang Yingying reminded, if "know fake buy fake" is to "fight against", can by the relevant Management department to report, etc., so that the operator was punished.