360 requests the Supreme Court to revoke the previous ruling of the Guangdong High House

360 lawyers at the trial scene.

November 26 morning, Qihoo 360 appealed to Tencent for abuse of market dominance, which was heard in the first court of the Supreme Court nine o'clock in the morning today. During the trial, 360 parties requested the Supreme Court to revoke the previous judgment of the Guangdong High House, demanding that Tencent have unfair competition and compensate for 360 economic losses of 150 million yuan.

As there is more evidence in this case, the issues involved are more complex, in order to ensure the efficient and smooth conduct of the trial, the court on November 19 has organized the exchange of evidence between the parties and the new evidence submitted by the other side of the certificate; On the basis of soliciting the views of the parties, the Chamber has initially summed up the main points of contention And asked the parties around the focus of the dispute to prepare accordingly.

So today's trial goes directly to the court investigation stage, with 360 first stating the appeal's request, facts and reasons.

360 counsel advocates that under regulation 19th of the Antimonopoly Act, an operator who has reached one-second per cent of the relevant market share may promote the operation to determine the market position. 360 said the first instance cognizance shows, contains the use time of the non comprehensive product, 2009 to 2011, by the above people in mainland China same product market share has been between 88% to 90%.

360, the market share of Tencent QQ is close to 80% even according to the opinion of the Court of First instance, which includes timely communication, micro-blogging and social networking sites.

Accordingly, 360 of the appeal request is 1, the abolition of the senior People's Court (2011) Guangdong Gaofamin The 2nd civil judgment, the case back to the Guangdong Provincial High People's Court, or on the basis of ascertaining the facts of the sentence, to support the appellant in the first instance of the request for Action, namely (1) To decree two appellants who immediately cease to abuse the dominant position of the monopoly in the market, including but not limited to the limited QQ software users and Qihoo company transactions, in QQ software bundled with security software products and other acts, (2) Decree two appellants jointly and severally compensate Qihoo company economic loss 150 million yuan; (3) Decree two appellant to the odd Tiger company apology; (4) The two appellants were awarded the reasonable expenses paid by Qihoo company for defending rights, including investigation fee, Notarization fee, lawyer's fee and so on, which amounted to 1 million yuan.

2, the case one or two trial costs are charged by the appellant two.