Ark's own controversial assailant must be condemned.

"Fight against the fighters" Ark in the afternoon of August 29 by unidentified persons using hammer and suspected anesthetic attack, triggering various arguments and speculation. In the 30th http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/894.html "> Media meeting, Fang said that the incident 100% has nothing to do with personal grievances, must be touched on the interest of a group of retaliation, Hope that the police seized the attackers behind the scenes, and said it would not shrink, "for the fight against counterfeiting, I still have to stick to the end."

For nearly 10 years, Fang, a PhD in biology, has been active in public space as a "doubters". His field of anti-counterfeiting, across the natural sciences, humanities and social sciences, the object of its questioning, including the state authority, the famous university professors and other social celebrities, its Fengman, "Gene Queen", "Working Emperor", "Health master" and so on are eclipsed. Naturally, such a resume has not only achieved the reputation of the ark, but also firmly fixed him in the "Trouble maker" position. When someone says bitterly, Fang to make it at least the loss of billions of dollars, the public can see that he to some groups of painstakingly woven benefits of the damage caused by the mechanism, coupled with personal speech, writing and even the specific style of doing things, are doomed Ark is a praise of the topic.

The controversial nature of the Ark was again verified in the attack. The wave of solidarity is in full swing, but on the internet, there is no lack of cynicism and even schadenfreude. The words "false", "Gai" and "hype for new books" are pouring out from the bystanders. After the police intervened, Fang and his family and lawyers strongly urged the police to step up the case, so the logic of the bystanders, it is not to say that the Beijing police and Ark in a "double"?

Violence must be condemned, wherever it came from and where it was directed, a basic position for modern citizens. It is not because of the violence to cater to individual emotions, for its applause, otherwise the violence may turn the direction of the oncoming. It should be noted that just two months ago, Fang's friend, Caijing magazine editor Fang, who was also attacked by unidentified persons in Beijing, remains an unsolved case. The first shock of violence is people's confidence in public safety, and when the Ark is unsafe, no one is safe. In addition, Fang and Fang earlier because of the investment in the fight against the cooperation, this identity determines the "behind the scenes have Black Hand" Lenovo natural, also reasonable.

Ark of the attack, and the people who have a direct confrontation between the psychological, not to be measured, but some online contrary to civilized common sense of the discussion is let a person ponder. Does this mean that over the years, Fang's crackdown not only seriously damaged the interests of those who are angling for fame, its subversion and destruction of idols, may not necessarily coincide with the expectations of some people? Ark Son review 10 years of counterfeiting, once lamented: "The extent of fraud spread far beyond my expectations, has been to the point of unbridled." I am obligated to fight against 100 of the year, but have been dealt with very few, and even revealed, there are many people stand up to maintain ... I think this society is not very normal. "The man who claims to be neat about the truth" thinks "society is not normal", and he is dismissed as "insane" by many people, a conflict that may be related to both realistic interests and social psychology. Society is like a huge body, and Ark is always in our thought rich and graceful look for the traces of the rout, cruel to show us, it is difficult to people like. This is like gadfly adsorption on animals, objectively played a rush to run and gain the vitality of the effect, but the animals will not appreciate, bystanders may not have pleasure. After the attack on the ark, many people likened him to Don Quixote, the windmill, and it seems to us that perhaps the metaphor of "gadfly" is more appropriate, in fact, in a conventional context, "gadfly" also means that an intellectual transcends professional limits and assumes responsibility for social responsibilities. Even a bite can be annoying, and how a society treats "gadfly" has become a yardstick for testing civilization. The Great Western doubters are able to emerge and gradually turn this question into the resources of social progress, because people have already deeply understood the role of "Gadfly".

After the violence, some people think that Fang's crackdown is due to the absence of state power, and this is an abnormal phenomenon. This analysis has its own truth, but if it becomes normal, then we will no longer need to be such a question like Ark? The answer should be no, because the society will always need the intellectuals to take responsibility, not just swordsman in the den.