From Guangzhou to send Alaska sled dog to Beijing training

From Guangzhou to send Alaska sled dog to Beijing training, but the dog but inexplicable death, the host of Ms. Liu will be commissioned by the training division sue a court claimed loss of more than 60,000 yuan. Reporter recently learned that the Chaoyang court recognized the two sides through the network chat way to reach the contract of foster animals, because the management of the Soviet Union can not prove that they have fulfilled the reasonable obligations, it should bear the responsibility of compensation, the verdict of Mr. Su compensation for Ms. Liu 13900 Yuan. It is reported that this is the first time the city court to determine the contract signed by QQ Legal and effective.

Ms. Liu, who lives in Guangzhou, said in a lawsuit August 2, 2008, its spend 24,000 yuan to buy two Alaska sled dog puppies, through the QQ on the dog domesticated group to know Sue MoU, learned that Su MoU has a kennel in Beijing Tongzhou, specially provides the pet dog's foster care, the training, and takes the dog to participate in the competition. After two people online consultation, decided by sue one of the sled dog training, Ms. Liu Monthly management fee of 3500 yuan.

March 24, 2009, Ms. Liu by air to the sled dogs transported to Beijing, Sue a commissioned Mr. Zhang will dog lead away. After that, the two people reported the sled dog on the internet every day. April 11, 2009, Sue suddenly said that the sled dog died in the cage. As Ms Liu was unable to get to Beijing, the sled dog was Su Ying and finally cremated at the Pet hospital. Since then, because Ms. Liu and Sue on the death of a sled dog can not reach agreement, Ms. Liu had to sue to court, Sue for compensation economic losses and spiritual losses in total 61380 yuan.

During the trial, Ms. Liu submitted a series of evidences such as 4500 yuan electronic bank record, QQ chat record and so on. And Sue I did not appear in court, his agent said Sue did not know Ms. Liu, no chat with the days, and not for its custody of the dog, so do not agree with Ms. Liu's all litigation request.

Chaoyang Court after hearing that, although Mr. Su did not acknowledge the facts mentioned by Ms. Liu, as two persons separated by thousands of kilometres, the plaintiff could know the defendant's name, ID number, telephone number, bank account and payment to him, while the facts reflected in the chat records were also related to other evidences, In this case the burden of proof is transferred by Sue. Because Sue does not provide any evidence, can not prove its receipt of the plaintiff's money has other basis, so the court found that Ms. Liu and sue a network chat consultation, established Ms. Liu's sled dog to sue a management, training to participate in the competition agreement. But the sled dog died during the management of the Soviet Union. Because Su MoU cannot prove that it has fulfilled the reasonable duty, the presumption belongs to its safekeeping bad, therefore should bear the damage compensation responsibility to Ms. Liu.

Finally, the court decided sue to compensate Ms. Liu 12000 yuan, and returned the custody fee not occurred 1900 yuan.