Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall
The
Internet name and digital address distribution Agency (ICANN) vetoed a proposal in Friday to locate a dedicated domain name for an adult web site with the XXX domain name.
Many people in the
adult entertainment industry and similar religious groups have been critical of the plan, and the Canadian government warned this week that the plan would make it difficult for Internet names and digital address distribution agencies to fall into the content-regulation business.
since the proposal was first proposed by ICM Registry, the industry has been arguing for seven years, and the ICANN committee eventually vetoed the proposal by a vote of 9 to 5, before ICANN vetoed a similar proposal twice. Paul Vome, ICANN's chief executive, said this week that the proposal was clearly controversial and the Committee had voted to veto the proposal, but did not specify why.
"We are extremely disappointed with the ICANN Committee's behaviour today," said Stuartlauri, president and chief executive officer of
ICM. The Commission's conduct was unjustified, and it was inconsistent with ICANN's own RFP proposal, Its approach is strongly ironic, laughable, with its own rules and regulations that do not discriminate in a groundless manner.
He added that ICM would continue to push ahead with the proposal when a journalist at the Associated Press asked if he would sue Icann, saying: "I do not rule out this possibility if necessary."
to be sure, ICANN could no longer hear the proposal, but that does not mean that the proposal would be shelved entirely.
almost all the members of the Committee who voted against it said that if the proposal was approved, they feared that ICANN might find itself trapped in a content-regulated business. Other members who voted for the vote said that ICANN could not prevent the use of new domain names because of fears of that happening. They say it is up to local, state and national laws and regulations to determine which content is pornographic.
Goldstein, a member of the committee, said before the vote: "My decision is cobwebs." The purpose of our committee is to find a solution that avoids the problem of ICANN being forced into content management and content regulation after the revised proposal is approved, That result is also inconsistent with ICANN's technical responsibilities.
for members of the Committee who claim they are worried about the domain name that will put ICANN in a regulatory dilemma, Labor criticized them for saying that the proposal would put ICANN in the middle of a content-management dilemma that they raised during the discussion.
Other members of the
committee said they believed the proposal was opposed by the adult industry, including webmasters, content providers and other parties, suggesting that. xxx domain name is not a popular domain name.
Remondo Becha, a member of the
committee, also voted against the proposal, saying: "The proposal did not meet the requirements of the proposal in community support." He added that the views of the adult entertainment industry on the proposal had not been agreed from the outset.
, who opposes the proposal, is concerned that the domain name will make it easier for governments to restrict them.
but ICM says it will fight the various measures taken by Governments.
Many religious groups are worried. The XXX domain name will justify adult sites and increase the number of adult sites, according to ComScore Media Metrix statistics show that the monthly visit to adult websites in the United States has reached more than one-third of the total number of Internet users. ComScore Media The Metrix company says 4% of internet traffic comes from adult sites, and netizens spend up to 2% of their online time on adult sites.
This is the third time that ICANN has vetoed a similar proposal. In 2000, it was equally concerned. The XXX domain name could put ICANN in the midst of a regulatory dilemma and veto a similar proposal.
ICM made a proposal again in 2004, and this time it proposed a proposal to set up a policy-setting organization to oversee it, thereby freeing ICANN from it. But many members of the Committee remain concerned that the wording of the draft is somewhat vague and may once again push the thorny issue back to ICANN. The Committee rejected the proposal submitted in 2004 last May.
ICANN resumed discussion of the proposal after ICM agreed to allow another independent organization to oversee the compliance with the new rules. The new rules will be compiled by an independent organization called the Online Responsibility International Foundation.
One months later, ICM revised its previous proposal to test ICANN's executive power and emphasized the independence of the policy-making organization.
view: ICANN shoots down. XXX verb recycle
