Nan Brokerage Company issued a statement that "buy red sister close friend" authenticity

Nan and buy red sister used to be a pair of couple. (data) The insider said to buy red sister did not let Nan see the children due to the third party divorce Sina Entertainment News December 1, a media published a "buy red sister close friend" of the exposure article, for Nan and buy red sister for custody of the children of the time, carried out a number of instructions, the article mentioned that buy red sister did not to prevent Nan see children and call " 110 ", also did not let Nan five months to see the child.　　Nan, the brokerage company in Beijing, the fate of the Sky Culture Communication Co., Ltd. issued a statement to respond, said the content of the article is untrue. Buy red sister don't let Nan take away the child the statement said, as early as a few months ago, buy red sister personally call kindergartens and schools, do not allow Nan I pick up the children, otherwise the school will bear all the consequences.　　This period, Nan often bought red sister side for various reasons refused to visit his son, later developed to inform property security to prevent Nan into the community, or even call 110 alarm phone. Nan for his wife and children left a large amount of property statement said, Nan and buy red sister is agreement divorce, divorce time and agreement content is available. Nan to buy red girls and their children left a huge amount of property, of which there are five real estate (including two villas) and 30 million cash.　　In addition, Nan also agreed to pay nearly 1 million yuan a year after the divorce of children living expenses. There are questions about the authenticity of the "exclusive contact". The statement said that the report called "No access to buy red sister phone" or "no contact." But the Nan question, "Why is it that only you keep in touch with everyone who is not in touch with the red girl?" The statement also said that the Nan aspect, whether Nan's broker Roggia, or Nan's friend Wang Yin, the director of the personal blog, are the name of the surname, but the report did not have real names, the content is "reliable news", "people who know" or "do not want to be named" manner of speech.