Server life will go to cloud computing is "zombie Dan"?

are small and medium-sized enterprises, server life will be. We have 150 end users who are using email and shared drives to deliver client business. And a lot of the data is very confidential, so we need security. What are the pros and cons of moving to the cloud?

I'll assume you're looking for a public cloud provider, like Amazon Web Services or Rackspace. A regular assessment of whether the move to the cloud is consistent with the server to be terminated is also the first benefit that will give you the opportunity to achieve cloud computing, reducing infrastructure spending.

If your server is terminated, these servers will no doubt be depreciated. By moving applications such as e-mail and file storage to the cloud, you can pay only for the server and disk capacity you use, not the new server. Storing data in the cloud can easily access backup, archive, and disaster recovery services at a lower price than in-house.

The security of confidential data is of course paramount. Because security is the biggest problem of avoiding the cloud, most infrastructure, the service (IaaS) provider, has the same security metrics for internal deployments. Security is handled both locally and in the cloud, but it can also be listed as one of the advantages of migrating to cloud applications.

In the past, performance and reliability are a barrier to moving e-mail to the cloud. Most end users rely on e-mail. Usually local mail, calendar components, and message reminders are tightly connected and users do not want to lose the efficient message transmission they have become accustomed to. So the important thing around cloud service providers is to provide the same performance and functionality for local choices that users are familiar with.

(Responsible editor: The good of the Legacy)