Tens of millions of dollars in the auction, where to go: One said that there is no take

Mr. Liang commissioned the auction company to auction dozens of pieces of the collection, and claimed that the two value of tens of millions of pieces of goods in the auction has not been returned.　　Yesterday afternoon, the two sides in the Xicheng court, the two pieces of the whereabouts of the diverging. Last April, Mr. Liang commissioned the Beijing Zong Xingji Bo Auction Co., Ltd. to auction 86 pieces of collectibles. The two sides signed a contract, the auction company also signed to confirm the receipt of all the products. But after the auction, only 8 of the 86 pieces were taken.　　The whereabouts of the rest of the film, the two sides have different statements, but also led to the lawsuit. Mr. Liang said that the two pieces of the product-the reserve price is 18 million yuan and 60,000 yuan of the bucket of lotus garlic bottle, pastel flowers and birds of the melon Ridge Water in the stream, the auction company has not returned.　　He asked the auction company to either return the collection or lose money. Mr. Wang, the legal representative of the auction company, came to court in person and gave a completely different story. Mr. Wang said that on the night after the auction, the company and Mr. Liang both counted the goods, except for 7 items to be inspected or inconvenient to carry, and the rest were taken back by Mr Liang.　　The credential is a copy of the retained item issued by the auction company. "This writing was written by the auction company without our signature and cannot be used as evidence," he said.　　Mr Leung's agent said that this was only to say that the 7 items were in the auction company and that Mr. Liang had returned all the rest. In the trial, the auction company to participate in the counting of the Office of the Head of the court to testify, said the content and Mr. Wang's statement is no different: "To be verified 7 items have been beaten, take away most of them, did not hit the bar." The judge asked, "Have you done this before?" Need a record of taking away?　　"No," replied the witness, who, according to the company's previous operation, had been ticked off on the client's contract, but Mr. Liang had claimed no contract when he counted them, so they wrote in writing only 7 items left. However, the witness's claim and the identity of the employee of the auction company were questioned by Mr. Liang. "How could a formal company be asked to take a picture without listing and loading the list of items?" he said. The agent said that the auction company bears the burden of proof of how much he has taken back. "The auction company could have asked Mr. Liang to make a receipt stating how many items to take away." "I am only responsible for keeping the items written according to what you are pulling away what do I write?"　　"Mr. Wang thinks that if he wants to return something or lose money, he will first show evidence to prove it in his company." As the plaintiff did not agree to mediate, the court did not mediate, the case was not pronounced.