The question of human flesh search leads to controversy

The standard human flesh search, should regard the disclosure information the behavior to be advantageous to the public interest, or to say whether legally

To carry out the news

Just passed the Zhejiang provincial People's Congress Standing Committee first of "Zhejiang Information Promotion Ordinance (draft)" on the dissemination of information on other provisions, and therefore was considered to be legislation to prohibit "human flesh search" and the cause of widespread concern.

Although the draft drafting department--Zhejiang Provincial Economic and Information Commission, the relevant officials repeatedly reiterated that the above provisions are mainly to protect the privacy of the parties, "not for the" human flesh search ", but still did not quell the debate on the matter.

——— Public questioning ———

Prohibit "human flesh search" in the name of "protecting personal information"?

Article 39th of the draft said that the collection of information from social organizations or individuals should be legally and rationally utilized. No entity or individual may publish, disseminate, delete or modify information about the right person in the network and information system without authorization. The article was interpreted by the media and netizens as a legislative restriction on "human flesh search".

"The truth is that corrupt officials are afraid of being exposed," "What is called unauthorized release, the law is not operational" ... News, caused netizens to talk about a sound.

In fact, Zhejiang is not "the first to eat crabs." As early as the fourth meeting of the NPC Standing Committee held in 2008, a member of the Standing Committee proposed that "online wanted" "human flesh Search" leaked the basic information such as Citizen's name, home address, personal telephone and so on, which is also a serious violation of the basic rights and interests of citizens, The damage is even more serious than the sale of personal information, so it is recommended that the "human Flesh search" Act be regulated in criminal law.

In April 2008, the implementation of the Guangdong Provincial Computer Information System Safety Protection Regulation 26th stipulates that "unauthorized disclosure of other people's e-mail address and other personal information information to third parties". Since then, Ningxia, Shanxi and other land have made similar provisions.

The most important thing is that last January 18, Jiangsu Province, the NPC Standing Committee of the seventh meeting through the "Prohibition without permission, provide or disclose the information of others" provisions of the "Xuzhou Computer Information System security regulations." Although the head of the Xuzhou People's Congress law Zeng Shingqing said that this is a misreading of the outside world, the regulations did not explicitly mention "human flesh search", this regulation at that time also caused great speculation and controversy.

In the midst of controversy and skepticism, however, these laws are finally passed.

Will it limit Internet opinion

Although the relevant departments have repeatedly clarified that it is not intended for human flesh search, but more than the wording of its provisions, "human flesh search" is clearly in the list of norms.

"Copper Door", cat abuse incident ... "human flesh search" the use of artificial participation to purify the search engine to provide information of a mechanism, gradually evolved into a network of "missing", or even "network wanted."

In such cases, "network wanted" is the embodiment of justice most of the time. From the network first violence case "death blog event" to "South China Tiger Incident" "Lin Case" and so on, human flesh search makes the power of the network unprecedented powerful.

The establishment of a number of network discourse platform, so that the citizens to express the threshold and cost reduction, through a person to ask questions, all the responses, gather the power of the vast number of netizens, tracing the truth and privacy of certain things or characters, and expose these details. It is a large number of netizens unremitting efforts to make the above events finally get to the bottom. The biggest challenge to the "disclosure of personal information" by netizens is the fear that it is an excuse to prevent public interest.

——— experts say ———

The supervision of public opinion should be moderate and not overstep