Weather change Congress refuses to drag word tactic

In Copenhagen December 17, Xinhua weather negotiations, complications, off, transfer responsibility will lead to the time to reach an agreement delay. Since their actual effects are related to "procrastination", some developing country representatives who have long participated in the weather negotiations call them the "drag" tactic.　　Read "Drag" word tactic, some developed countries enjoy. For the Copenhagen Conference, the negotiation process was launched 4 years ago, with the aim of developing emission reduction targets for the Kyoto Protocol's second commitment period (2013 to 2020) and related financial support topics. However, the EU and a number of developed countries have put forward the merger of the two-track negotiations on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol as a whole, in an attempt to abandon the protocol altogether. In order to achieve their goals, they have even made various excuses and made a lot of gestures, in essence to make the developed countries do not have to bear the burden of substantial quantitative emission reduction obligations as required by the Protocol.　　This naturally met the resolute opposition of the vast majority of developing countries. On the morning of 16th, once again, Denmark, the President of the Conference on Climate change, has been a further digression, violating the procedures of the General Assembly, attempting to pass the discussion of the reports of the two ad hoc working groups of the Convention and the Protocol, and submitting a privately prepared draft agreement to the General Assembly for discussion, which is strongly opposed by the　　Noting that the draft was in breach of procedure, the plenary Assembly was interrupted. The topic of funding was crucial, and under the Convention, developed countries had an obligation to provide funding to all developing countries for mitigating and adapting to climate change. However, the developed countries have off on this topic so far.　　Representatives of developing countries noted that the EU's financial support for the next 3 years would be only 2.4 billion euros a year, and that the developing countries had been decisively advocating that they would get at least 100 billion dollars a year before 2020 years ago. On the issue of emission reduction, developed countries have spared no effort to shift responsibility. Root accounted for the calculation, according to the Group of Eight and OECD, the so-called emission reduction route arrangement, from 2006 to 2050, the cumulative per capita emissions in developed countries is 2.3 times times to 5.4 times times that of the developing world.　　To pass on the responsibility is to ask the developing countries to "pay more" for reducing emissions, what is the fairness of the design of the developed countries?　　Developed countries have been toying with delaying tactics for nearly 4 years, with the real aim of bringing down or even cancelling the protocol so that they do not have to undertake substantial quantitative emission reduction obligations, while at the same time trying to drag developing countries into the framework of specific emission reduction tasks and pass on emission reduction responsibilities. The challenge of global weather change is very serious, "drag" the word tactic, drag is the global environment and the future of mankind, the developed countries themselves will eventually suffer.