Abstract: Mention write article do not know how many people baffled. And for the webmaster, we are more interested in false original, collection, copy and paste. In the station a row QQ group has a friend to ask Guardian Kun a question: Why other people's website (new station) copy pastes collects good
I don't know how many people have been stumped to write an article. And for the webmaster, we are more interested in false original, collection, copy and paste. In the station a row QQ group has a friend to ask Guardian Kun a question: Why others ' website (new station) copy pastes collects good, but I have the weight, the rank is good, the snapshot day website copy pastes but appears to collect the question? Is it unreasonable? For this problem, the Guardian Kun just has a new station, the index is more than 80%, The collection rate reached 90%. So to share their experience to everyone, hope can give webmaster friends some help.
This paper discusses the content optimization in the station, while the content optimization is basically original, pseudo original and copy and paste. For the original, is generally unique, so do not consider. Of course, pseudo original and collection copy paste category, then why other people's Web site copy and paste has the effect of their own site but did not? First, three factors should be considered.
One: Do we retain the original copyright.
Believe that a lot of webmasters, whether in the station update or outgoing chain are like to copy-paste-to copyright-plus links (appropriate changes)-published. For such behavior has also caused a lot of original criticism, of course, everyone is for better publicity, this is understandable. But how many people have thought about how much we mean? like Guardian Kun write this article, will publish to own blog, QQ Space, Sina blog, NetEase blog, stand a row, real name Network Marketing, A5 Forum, webmaster Home and so on. This article comes with basically all of your own blog links, when a friend copies this article pasted to his website, plus his own copyright. In fact, in the search engine database has certainly had this article (for example, stand a row, A5, Webmaster's home are seconds). The search engine believes that the guardian of the blog is original, the other several sites are sharing (the same content). And everyone copied add their own links to the article can only be considered plagiarism, because this ratio is N:1, who know true or false.
Two: Copy paste there is no integration of their own ideas.
For this factor, that is, everyone said false original. Revise other people's articles. Many friends are lazy, using false original tools. What false original tool to rewrite the article can read fluent? There are a lot of stationmaster may say, my website content is to search engine to look, not to the user to see. If so, then guardian Kun speechless. But who has the website to leave the user? The content of the website is not to the user, and the end is just away from the user. Therefore, for such a problem, the guardian of the proposed false original is also the best artificial way, with their own words to speak out. or directly at the end of the article to write a small comment one hundred or two hundred words, plus their own website information for promotion.
Third: Try not to choose the network flood information.
Many friends in the early update site like the use of collection tools, a large area of the updated content. In fact, a lot of content is rampant on the internet, on their own site does not have much meaning. Like Guardian Kun Blog is now basically the article seconds, the first two days without writing articles reproduced several articles (original reproduced), reproduced in this several articles although included, but the time is much slower, almost half an hour to be included. In fact, this is also a very important information, because the article has appeared on the network a lot, but because the Guardian is reproduced in the original, to a greater extent is the role of sharing. So it can be included.
For original, pseudo original, collect and copy and paste the question everybody already said a lot. There are many owners have been asked why their own site is not included in the page, included slow, low rate, the Guardian Kun write this article is to let everyone correct treatment of the site's internal article optimization. Of course, specific operational details need to be discussed together. (Currently there is a new station three month article 1000, index 850, included 730)