Zijin Mining is accused of a lightly punished Ah unit announced chairman pay difference 2.9 million

The "Zijin Mining tingjiang pollution case" finally let Zijin Mining (601899,SH;02899,HK) executives punished, but around the Chinese polluting enterprises have the highest amount of environmental protection ticket, the final punishment results still attracted a lot of criticism. "Daily economic News" Yesterday (December 29), the reporter exclusively learned that December 28 ~ 29th, the Ministry of Environmental Protection Department of Policy and Law and the Administrative Review Office has two consecutive days to interview the Chongqing Green Volunteer Federation (hereinafter referred to as Chongqing Green Association) of the relevant person in charge of the Zijin mining processing results of communication. In the 28th interview in Chongqing, "Fujian Province Environmental Protection Department emphasized that the Zijin mining related punishment is the law administration, the below punishment", the Chongqing Green Union president Wu Dengming told "The Daily economic news" reporter, but the Zijin mining in the A and H shares announced the chairman salary difference nearly 3 million yuan, the final punishment "too light"　　, and the pollution caused by the company, not only to the water pollution, should comprehensively assess the damage to the local ecosystem, comprehensive assessment, comprehensive compensation. Fujian Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau, a head of the policy and law department confirmed the talks, he told the Daily Economic news Reporter: "The office is in accordance with the Zijin mining provided by the Chairman of the income certificate below punishment." As for the A-shares and H-share pay is a big difference, it is not clear.　　"Many times the reporter calls Zijin mining dong to do, the telephone has been unanswered." Executive pay 2.92 million yuan on the two sides. December 27, the Fujian Provincial Environmental Protection Office issued a decision on administrative punishment, Zijin Mining Chairman Chen Jinghe, director and Zijin Gold copper mine manager Laichang respectively sentenced to 706,000 yuan and 450,000 yuan of administrative punishment.　　Prior to this, Zijin mining was fined 9.56 million yuan, as China's polluting enterprises have the highest amount of environmental fines. So far, the "Zijin mining tingjiang Pollution case", which took place 4 months ago, seems to have come to an end. But for the Environmental Protection Department to make the above punishment, the focus of attention is "Chairman Chen Jinghe is according to below punishment?" Can a ticket repair the local ecological environment? "Why is the chairman of the Zijin Mining and H-shares announced a 2.92 million yuan salary difference?" "Wu Dengming in the understanding of this difference, the Fujian provincial Environmental Protection Department of the punishment of the dispute.　　Some people concerned have raised similar questions. One months ago, when the Zijin mining was fined, Chongqing Green Union submitted a request for administrative reconsideration of the matter to the Ministry of National Environmental Protection. At that time, Wu Dengming on the "daily economic news" that the Fujian Environmental Protection Office to be punished by the determination of inaccurate, there is "abandon the cart", to disguise the root of the law.　　According to the Water Pollution Control law, the occurrence of this kind of accident can not be simply identified as the momentary negligence of Zijinshan Gold copper mine and the personal problem of factory leadership, but should be investigated Zijin mining industry generally missing, long-term missing, serious lack of environmental management. It is reported that this reconsideration application was sent to the National Ministry of Environmental Protection policy and regulation around November 3. 3 days ago, the Fujian Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau held the chairman Chen Jinghe, director and the gold mine of ZijinshanLaichang's responsibility is to punish two people for 50% of their income from the company's last year. "This is already in accordance with the provisions of the below punishment," said the head of the Fujian Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau policy and Regulation department, the two people's income certificate is provided by Zijin mining, when the Zijin mining has been required to provide income must be consistent with previous earnings.　　"Daily economic news" Reporter noted that if the Zijin mining A-share report of the 2009-year chairman Chen Jinghe annual salary of 2.7598 million yuan (pre-tax) calculation, after deducting various taxes in accordance with the 50% fine, the final fine and announced the amount of the same. However, the annual report of the Zijin mining H shares shows that Chen Jinghe's payroll amounted to $5.68 million last year (before tax), which includes three parts, namely, compensation, allowances, in-kind benefits and dividends. This and a a-share announced annual difference of 2.92 million yuan. "As to why there is such a big gap, we do not know," said the head of the policy and Regulation Department of the Fujian Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau. The daily economic news reporter called Zijin mining chief yesterday afternoon, and its telephone has been unanswered.　　The biggest difference, according to a senior accountant at the Zijin mining firm, is that the pay composition of the two places is different and the stick is not the same. NGO: Investigation should be more comprehensive December 28 4 o'clock in the afternoon, a director from the Department of Policy and regulation of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Fujian Province, Environmental Protection Bureau of the Department of Policy and regulation of a director to Chongqing, and Wu Dengming for up to two hours of communication.　　The director of the Policy and law department of the Fujian Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau confirmed the talks, but he stressed that "the Fujian side only accompanied the Ministry of Environmental Protection to participate in the communication". But in Wu Dengming's view, the Fujian side in the talks is still the role of the protagonists.　　"They have always stressed that the Zijin mining related punishment is the legal administration, below punishment," Wu Dengming told the Daily Economic news reporter, Fujian Province Environmental Protection Department said, whether it is for the company or individuals, are according to national laws and regulations to determine, according to the highest standards of punishment. Fujian Province Environmental Protection Department gives the punishment basis is-"The People's Republic of China Water Pollution Control Law" 83rd article "... In the event of serious or extraordinary water pollution, the people's government may, with the approval of the right, be ordered to close, and the directly responsible officer and other persons directly liable may be fined under 50% of the income obtained from the unit in the previous year.　　The Chen Jinghe and Laichang received a ticket that was 50% of their last year's income. "Additional executive punishment" is a place that the Chongqing Green Alliance has previously considered to be omitted in the administrative reconsideration application.　　Wu Dengming in the communication has been stressed that the Zijin mining pollution, not only the water pollution, should comprehensively assess the damage caused by the entire ecosystem of the incident, comprehensive assessment, comprehensive compensation, the victim's compensation can not give a sum of money. Although the talks did not make much progress, Wu Dengming stressed that the Environmental Protection Department's attitude is quite sincere. That evening, the Fujian Environmental Protection Agency and the National Environmental Protection Department officials returned to Beijing。 For the Chongqing Green Union submitted to the National Environmental Protection Department of Administrative Reconsideration application, the Ministry of Environmental Protection has promised to Wu Dengming, will be detailed investigation issued a written reply. Wu Dengming said, "I am not satisfied with the existing results of the Zijin mining, the investigation should be more comprehensive, the intensity of punishment should be greater."　　"And Xia Jun, an important participant in the Chongqing Green Alliance, said that if the final ruling of the Ministry of Environmental Protection is unfair, he will not rule out legal rights."　　Chenming Paper 6 years of environmental violations 21 times 24 environmental protection NGO joint urging rectification compensation is ranked in the world paper 50 Shandong Chenming Paper Group (hereinafter referred to as chenming paper), due to the alleged environmental violations again criticized. Recently, 24 environmental groups wrote a letter to the company, asking the company to explain environmental violations and to make practical action on pollution.　　It is reported that the joint letter from the header is, Environmental protection organization Research found that chenming paper in the environmental violations were punished, the corresponding pollution is still continuous, illegal activities have not been effectively curbed.　　According to the daily economic news reporter to grasp the information shows that between 2004 to 2010, Chenming paper and its affiliated enterprises environmental violations up to 21 times.　　May 2010, the Ministry of Environmental Protection issued a public company supervision of environmental issues, publicly informed Chenming paper enterprises in the environmental violations, which has been the company's third public criticism. Chen Ming Paper Environmental Protection and Energy Conservation department a surname in charge of the daily economic news reporter said, "Now have not received the letter, the company currently does not exist environmental violations." I don't know much about the subordinate business. "6 years of environmental violations 21 days ago, an open letter from environmental organizations through the relevant channels sent to chenming paper."　　As of 29th, environmental groups have not received any response from the company. Data show that chenming paper is a pulping, paper-oriented enterprises, is the first in the country, B, H-Shares listed companies, currently has more than 10 subsidiaries, total assets of nearly 30 billion yuan, the annual paper production capacity of 4 million tons.　　However, the Anhui Wuhu Ecological Center survey found that since 2004, chenming paper pollution problem has not been interrupted. May 2010, the Ministry of Environmental Protection in the public notify Chenming paper under the Hailaer chenming paper pulp production line inspection still failed to perform the EIA and acceptance formalities.　　After the briefing, in September, chenming paper issued a rectification of the completion of the announcement, but the October Hailaer chenming again due to smoke exceeded the Environmental protection Department punishment.　　In July, the Yanbian Chenming Co., Ltd. for violating environmental protection laws and regulations, pollution control facilities run abnormally, long-term excessive discharge, the environment caused serious pollution, by the Environmental Protection Department of Jilin Province listed supervision.　　Before this, 2006 years or so, including Wuhan Chenming, Chibi chenming, Jiangxi Chenming, Jilin Chenming, Heze morning, such as many of the Chenming branch, most of the illegal, excessive discharge. According to incomplete statistics, chenming paper in these three or four years, in response to excessive emissions of waste water and other environmental violations,Although there are issued rectification of the completion of the announcement, but environmental violations are still not effectively curbed.　　NGO urged to compensate the injured residents in the aforementioned environmental protection organization issued the "chenming letter" said: "We are very concerned about industrial pollution, Chenming Group and its subordinate enterprises environmental violations are common, and lack of open, effective corrective action."　　Wuhu Ecological Center Project Director Tian Shi to the "Daily economic news" reporter said, hope chenming paper can come up with a set of rectification program, especially for Hailaer and other companies, to carry out third-party clean production audit. The open letter also requests that enterprises and their enterprises immediately stop illegal sewage, strictly abide by the relevant national environmental laws and regulations, to the victims of the residents apology and compensation, and in accordance with the Clean Production Promotion Act 31st, "Environmental Information Disclosure Method (Trial)",　　To disclose to the public and the consumers of the enterprise products the relevant illegal pollution information, such as the construction and operation of the environmental protection facilities of the illegal enterprises and the corrective measures, as well as the contingency plan of environmental pollution accidents. The open letter states that as a listed company, Chenming paper should be in accordance with the Securities Act 62nd and the State Council issued the "on the law against and control of Capital Market insider trading Opinion", timely disclosure of major corporate information, but also include major environmental accident information to ensure that shareholders, investors rights are protected.