nimble storage comparison

mysql| Comparison | performance MySQL supports the two main table storage format Myisam,innodb, last month when doing a project, first used InnoDB, the result is particularly slow, 1 seconds can only insert 10. Later replaced by the MyISAM format, a second inserted tens of thousands of bars. It was decided that the performance of the two tables was too different. Later, I guess, should not be so slow, it is

Storage comparison of various variables/constants in c ++:Variable location variable type visibility storage location name connection example--------------------------------------------Local variables in the function. The stack in the function does not exist. Fun () {int ;}Static variable in the function. This compilation unit is connected to fun () {static int A

[Concurrent concurrency] _ [C/C ++] _ [Use Thread Local Storage (TLS)-comparison between win32 and pthread],-win32pthread Scenario: 1. count the number of objects created on a thread. 2. When the created heap space needs to be created and destroyed Based on thread needs. 3. because the range is that the thread can only view its own stored data, it does not need to maintain its own heap memory in the critic

I registered the password with MD5 encryption in the way of storage in mysql, in the login with MD5 () comparison, The value has been wrong, resulting in a failure, to find answers

MySQL supports the two main table storage format Myisam,innodb, last month when doing a project, first used InnoDB, the result is particularly slow, 1 seconds can only insert 10. Later replaced by the MyISAM format, a second inserted tens of thousands of bars. It was decided that the performance of the two tables was too different. Later, I guess, should not be so slow, it is estimated that the inserted statement has a problem, decided to do a test: