clamav review

Living in this secular world, it is inevitable to do some things, such as title review! There is a senior title that can bring you various benefits, you can easily change a job. to prove your ability to work, you always need to use specific things, especially in a new environment where others do not know you yet. The advantage is that the title may be linked to the basic salary, "three gold", and the attendance award. In short, it can bring some econo

Use the [iconix] method to practice Blog Design 3 [Requirement Review] The purpose of the requirement review is to ensure that the use case and domain model meet the customer's requirements at the same time.Functional requirements. Make sure that the customer knows the development teamDesign Based on these requirements. It is also a milestone in the system analysis phase (milestone ). The position of this p

========================================================== =============================== Original blog, reprinted please declare the source of Electronic coffee (original id blue rock) ========================================================== ================================ On the review board management page, we can see four options: users is used to manage users and permissions, review groups is used

In fact, the peer review rules are simple, but they are the most important part of software development quality assurance. Unlike other reviews, peer review reviewers have a fundamental understanding of the objects to be reviewed, it has a similar technical background with the author of the reviewed object. In this way, it is easier to discover the defects and problems of objects, and learn more knowledge a

Individuals write their own code without a review process, which is indeed faster. Developers will naturally like and have this kind of preference, because it feels free and there are some ugly places that will not be seen by others... However, if a program is maintained by many people and requires high quality and stability, code review is needed to ensure code quality. Code

Chapter 2 Collaborative construction talked about review and inspection, which resonated with each other and reminded me of the good time I spent working in my company. In the company, project code is common, and it is no exception to our part-time students. The first thing to do at work every day is to update and retrieve the latest code base from depot (we call it sync, which is the command of our version control software ). Before checking in, you

Because our team now uses Crucible as a code review tool, I asked my colleagues to study the use of this tool, and this is the result of his research, and I just translated it in Chinese: Examples, such as the one named Charles Wang, examine the code written by Kevin Qian. For author Author: (1) Login Code Review page home page. (2) Click the "Create Review"

A tiered review can help you control the Internet content you see on that computer. This function is very useful, if you have children in your home, this function can help you to prevent him from surfing the internet when you are not at home, such as violence and sex. In fact, people who have used IE may know the classification of the password, if you have not noticed, please run IE, click the "tools" → "Internet Options" menu, in the pop-up dialog bo

In "The top of the Tide", Wu teacher described the early work of Google, a part of the said: I usually after dinner to the code modified list sent to Craig to do code review, he generally at night around 10 o'clock will reply to me, give me a change of opinion, detailed to a line more a space. This content is actually the process of peer review in the process of software development.Naturally, in some of th

This is determined by the design of Gerrit, which is definitely not a bug. A change ID is generated each time a commit is sent, and the review request is bound to this change ID. Two solutions: 1. Engineers should use less commit as much as possible. Each time they use git add to manage the work zone, they will call git commit once before git push review. 2. many people suggest that: Call git commit for the

Detailed explanation of the solution that fails the small program review, detailed explanation of the small program Preface Recently, applets have been active in developers' eyes. Many developers are involved in the development of small programs, and these developers always need to face the last challenge: how to pass the official review in an elegant manner. This article is based on a summary submitted for

Label: Style Color SP strong on problem code design programCode Lookup: Programmers and testers form a review team to run the program through logic.Step 1: The team members should read the design specifications, program texts, and other relevant documents in advance.Step 2: Use test cases to run program logic, record traces of programs, and discover, discuss, and solve problemsCode Review: Programmers and t

Software Test case review software testIt is very important to review test cases. After the test cases are designed, they should be reviewed and reviewed in an informal and formal manner. During the test case review and review, the following items are checked:Whether the overall idea of the test case design is clear, w

Recently, a friend's company wants to find someone to develop a futures trading system suitable for his company, but I am afraid that people may put some backdoor code in the Program (for fear that people may steal company's confidential files, accounts, funds, etc.), so I would like to ask a team to review the code before the program is put into use, check whether the system contains such code.Code Review:

This article is the fifth part of the "loose Pair programming" series. (One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, and eight, the ninth and later articles in this series can be found in the topic catalog .) The loose pair is different from the tight pair. Two people don't always sit together to locate the problem and solve the problem at any time, but sit together for a short time. There are two main tasks at the post-Checkpoint: one is to check whether the results meet the requirements (what to d

First, pay attention to the correctness of the Requirements Specification review The correctness of requirements specifications can often be reflected in the following aspects: Are there conflicting or overlapping needs with other requirements? Usually a hundreds of-page requirement specification will not be done overnight, and it may be a few nights of system analyst effort. It is precisely because of the continuity of the writing process that may