cloudflare performance comparison

A simple performance test comparison was made, with 4 English characters passed. Ice is also called by Java.JDK8 x64 bit, compile level 1.7, native Windows 64-bit, 4-core 4g memory test.Google Protocol buffer version 2.5;Ice uses Windows 32-bit, version 3.5.1.The code does not do too much optimization, the connection time is not calculated.Test only the speed aspect, no test transmission packet size, did no

Kdoc.tar 16660480 6987402 41.93% 102.86ms 108.2ms Kinc.tar 18257920 5684927 31.13% 106.87ms 113.86ms Official website: http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/A comparison from the Hbase:the definitive guide: Algorithm % remaining Encoding Decoding Gzip 13.4% MB/s 118 MB/s LZO 20.5%

MySQL two table storage structures: MyISAM and InnoDB performance comparison test, myisaminnodb Reproduced http://www.jb51.net/article/5620.htm MySQL supports two main table storage formats: MyISAM and InnoDB. InnoDB was used for a project last month. The results are very slow and only a dozen pieces can be inserted in one second. Later I changed to MyISAM format and inserted tens of thousands of entries in

UbuntuFedoraMandriva performance comparison-general Linux technology-Linux technology and application information. The following is a detailed description. From: driver home Recently, Phoronix conducted 28 performance comparison tests on three popular Linux releases: Ubuntu 8.04, Fedora 9, and Mandriva 2008.1 using

Article Title: Performance Comparison of Ubuntu, Fedora, and MandrivaLinux. Linux is a technology channel of the IT lab in China. Includes basic categories such as desktop applications, Linux system management, kernel research, embedded systems, and open source. Recently, Phoronix conducted 28 performance comparison t

Performance Comparison of Php three accelerators hardware environment: Server: DL180G6 nbsp; (16 nbsp; Intel (R) Xeon (R) CPU nbsp; nbsp; E5620 nbsp; @ 2.40 GHz) nbsp; nbsp; nbs Php performance comparison of three accelerators Hardware environment: Server: DL180G6 (16 Intel (R) Xeon (R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40 GHz) 1

Arm Evolution Changes:ARM Classic: ARM7,ARM9,ARM11 performance in turn.Cortex:M Series: Cortex-m0,cortex-m1,cortex-m2,cortex-m3,cortex-m4 used in industrial control field (no operating system) analogy single-chip microcomputer performance than monolithic microcomputer strong.R Series: Cortex-r4 for real-time applications, you can run the operating system.A series: Cortex-a5,cortex-a8,cortex-a9 mainly for mu

operations on testingWebAll applications are simple.HelloWorldProgram.SpringHelloworldProgram passedAnnotationDefinesControllerClass, setMessage, ViewIsJSPPage to display thisMessage.Struts2 helloworldThe program implementsAction,Which definesMessage,OneJSPThe page is used to display thisMessage.In short, these two programs have the same logic and are simple and simple. As a comparison, it is also tested during each testTomcatRootUnderIndex. jspFile,

Work often encounter to put 2 or more strings into a string of problems, in the JS to deal with such problems in general there are three ways, here they are listed in the way also to make a specific comparison of their performance. The first method connects the strings to be concatenated with the connector "+": Str= "a"; str+= "B"; There is no doubt that this method is the most convenient and

mysql| Comparison | performance MySQL supports the two main table storage format Myisam,innodb, last month when doing a project, first used InnoDB, the result is particularly slow, 1 seconds can only insert 10. Later replaced by the MyISAM format, a second inserted tens of thousands of bars. It was decided that the performance of the two tables was too different.

. first, the Google code for each language, using the language of the idiomatic container class benchmark, loop structure, and memory / Object Allocation Plan--no language is used, designed to maximize the performance of specific tools. "This approach allows for the language features, code complexity, compiler and compile-time, binary size, run time and memory footprint almost fair comparison," said the f

From the principle we can know that the efficiency of unshift is lower. The reason is that every element it adds, it moves the existing element down one position. But how effective is the difference? Let's test it here.The main hardware of the test environment: CPU T7100 (1.8G), memory 4G DDR2 667, HDD 5400 RPM. Main software: Operating system for Windows 7, browser for Firefox 3.6.9. Test code: var arr = [], s = +new Date; // push performance te

Performance Comparison of blocked queuesIt mainly compares the performance of the offer and poll methods, and opens n threads. Each thread writes to the queue or takes 500 integers. Number of threads 20 50 100 200 500 1000 Linkedblockingqueue 15, 0 31,15 32, 16 63,32 203,47 563,110 Arrayblockingqueue

3rd Times 4th times Average Cos 55813 52282 54796 51187 53520 Fileupload 76343 68531 80954 79031 76215 Smartupload Memory Stack Overflow From the comparison above, we can see that cos always maintain good performance. When the upload volume is small (the capacity is less than 2 MB, which is the most common case), co

Label:Recently, the well-known independent benchmark evaluation agency Bankmark, for the current mainstream NoSQL database sequoiadb, MongoDB and Cassandra three NoSQL database products to do performance comparison testing and release test reports. in all of the tests, the three NoSQL database products have the same performance, no product can be defeated in all

Comparison of the performance of adding page elements to createElement and innerHTML of Javascript recently encountered js efficiency problems, which are about adding elements to the page. Suppose we have the following page: The Code is as follows: Script // Script location Script Now, we want to add objects to p1. We all know that the following code can be used to add an element to a web p

Php + mysql prequery prepare and general query performance comparison, mysqlprepare Prepare can solve the load and overhead brought by a high-traffic website to the database server. This article introduces the performance comparison between prepare and common queries through examples, for more information, see. The ins

: This article mainly introduces the performance comparison between using file_get_content series functions and using curl series functions to collect images. For more information about PHP tutorials, see. Because the background car content of a company's car website is mainly from the home of the car, editing colleagues must manually add cars to the home of the car every day, it is too painful. So, to chan

4559: [JLoi2016] Performance comparison time Limit: Sec Memory Limit: + MB Submit: PNS Solved: 29 [Submit] [Status] [Discuss] Descriptiong Department has a total of n students, M-gate compulsory. The number of these n classmates is 0 to N-1, where B is number No. 0. This m-gate compulsory number is a 0 to M-1 integer. The score that a classmate can get on a compulsory course is 1

List And shortlist Performance Comparison A listlist Now, let's start with the performance comparison: The list Add DeleteAdding or deleting nodes in the list List Compared with the Add * method of the garbage list IndexThe other part of the List SearchWhen searching for an element or node, the lis