Automatically submit a code review request using RbtoolObjectiveLet's recall the process of submitting a review request manually:
First you have to generate the diff file with svn diff > filename.diff.
Then enter the URL of the review board, which may be rb.companyname.com
You will then need to enter your account password for login verification.
Code Review Chinese should be translated as "code review" or "code review". This is a process. When a developer writes the code, he/she needs to let others review its code, this is an effective way to discover bugs. Therefore, we can review the code style, logic, and ideas .
Attitude determines everything:
Code Review, as an important part of software development, is also a link with a high degree of interaction between people. The attitude of participants on Code Review will greatly affect the effect of Code Review. Programmers are a group of people who are not good at communicating with others. In this way, there may be a big gap i
First login, clickSummary, description, Testingdone, branch, Group, people , Review upload diff file, select project, New Request Publish Released: Review Board Support Pre-commit Review and Post-commit Review two modes, in short, is the first Review to submit or first commi
We often hear team members say:
"This project is a waste of time doing code reviews. ”
"I don't have time to do code reviews. ”
"The conference was delayed because my despicable colleague had not reviewed my code. ”
"Can you believe that my colleague actually asked me to change my code?" I'm so graceful and perfect where the code needs to be changed. ”
Why do we have to do code review?
One of the most important goals of any professional software dev
First, I started in September 2015 to prepare for 803--, which is the computer science and technology major . Now smoothed the plan, I was the review of each of the subjects were divided into three paragraphs: the first stage, combined with the review of all the knowledge of the teaching materials to all-round scanning, fully understand and understand, in fact, follow the
Through this class library, you can automatically analyze the input content and give a score. The program can determine whether the content has reached a certain sensitivity level based on this score, so as to perform corresponding automatic processing.
If such a database is combined with a manual review, the results will be very good: the suspicious content of the server review is automatically submitted
First, describe it, And then summarize it, and finally design and implement it.
Statement:
1. Save the documents to be submitted.
After the operator makes a ticket, he may go to the toilet. He is in a hurry. Just as he writes a ticket on paper, he has not confirmed that the ticket should be sent to the superior leadership for review.
2. Submitted by the operator, indicating that the documents can be reviewed and self-reviewed.
3. The first
Gerrit code review server workflow and principles the Google Android open-source project has two important innovations in the use of git. One is the repo introduced for multi-version library collaboration, we have discussed this in detail before. Another important innovation is Gerrit, the code review server. Gerrit is mandatory for the code review introduced by
Personally understood, code review has two functions:
1. Two people are always more thoughtful than one person, looking at the angle of the problem it is easier to find bugs or find simpler and more effective solutions. The so-called onlooker sees most is the truth.
2. Ideally everyone in the team is familiar with every part of the project, but when the project is large it is not realistic, and the code review
Design reviews are an important part of the design process. It is a part of the design process that cannot be overlooked, whether in an independent design team, or in a mobile or remote design group. Through the team design review, in different members of the review, comments to get feedback, so that you stand outside the perspective of the previous design works, so you can better make design decisions, ove
I recently read an article about code review on infoq, which is a translation edited by infoq. I later read the original article, and I feel that the translator has missed some background knowledge and more details of the original article. So I re-translated it again. Please criticize and correct the translation.
Original article and infoq link:
Infoq: http://www.infoq.com/cn/news/2010/12/agile-code-review
Specially planned on 51cto Security ChannelThe path to growth of cisspIn the previous articles in the series, j0ker briefly introduced the basic information about the cissp Certification Examination, however, for those who want to learn more about the cissp certification system or want to get a cissp certification, the content is a little simpler. Therefore, from the beginning of this article, j0ker will spend about 15 articles to introduce the review
First, background: This week's software testing in the classroom, we in the case of self-grouping, Yao classmate's car parking location management system has peer Review, Chinese is peer test. This is the first time I've been in touch with peer testing, so let me introduce peer review.Second, peer review definition: is a way to identify defects through the author's peers and need to change the area of the i
Programmer's top ten troubles-csdn. Net http://www.csdn.net/article/2012-11-22/2812154-Ten-Trouble-Programmers
Question and counterargument to several traditional ideas of software development-csdn. Net http://www.csdn.net/article/2012-11-21/2812095-Software-Development
20 common code traps have you been shot? -Csdn. Net http://www.csdn.net/article/2012-11-19/2811978-20-All-Too-Common-Coding-Pitfalls-For-Be
[Discussion] Code Review: is it a good idea
Software Review
The software review is not reviewed after the software development is completed, but is reviewed at all stages of the software development. Because errors may occur at all stages of software development. If these errors are not found and corrected in time, they will be constantly expanded, which may lead to uncontrollable development results.
Software
Remember the last time review Board This online code review tool was a year ago, when the review Board version was 1.0.3; A colleague from the department is also tossing review Board, but now the version has been upgraded to 1.5.1. The new version of review board apparently
Reprint Test Case ReviewThe first thing to know is the definition of internal review, the internal review of the Test team, or the review within the project team. The review is defined differently and the content is not the same.I. Review classification: Test group Internal
In the development process, many teams use code reviews or code Review to ensure code quality. Generally, code Review uses a collective Review.
Collective Review
Form: A team is sitting in a meeting room. One person explains his own business and code implementation, and other members of the team
In the area of software development, code review appears to be a controversial, fairly peaceful topic.
The prevailing view is that code censorship is a good thing. Some companies or organizations even force the requirement to audit the code as a necessary process.
Review is a good measure to catch bugs and problems. The ability to share domain knowledge and improve code quality through code reviews. Code
The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion;
products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the
content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem
within 5 days after receiving your email.
If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to:
info-contact@alibabacloud.com
and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.