ESI, dword ptr [ESI + 78 H] // data directory Table offsetAdd ESI, EBXMoV EDI, dword ptr [ESI + 20 h] // function name array offsetAdd EDI, EBXMoV ECx, dword ptr [ESI + 14 h] // number of elements in the function address ArrayPush ESIXOR eax, eaxMoV edX, dword ptr [ESI + 24 h] // function name sequence number table array offsetAdd edX, EBXSHL eax, 1 // count * 2Add eax, EDX // count + function name sequenc
sufficiently compatible with the real attack features? Through vulnerability analysis, we will naturally draw a conclusion. Czy82 on the nsfocus Technology Forum published a detailed analysis of this vulnerability, see the original article: http://bbs.nsfocus.net/index.php? Act = se F = 3 t = 159298 P = 299648
The code analysis snippets of server processing commands and parameters in the analysis document are as follows:
========================================================== ============
determines whether the returned result is near or far (of course, the pseudo command is not visible from the executable file ).In wvin7 + vs2008 + release, this situation is much more complicated.
--- D: \ coding \ helloworld \ testc \ main. c optional int main () {00331370 push EBP 00331371 mov EBP, esp 00331373 sub ESP, 0c0h 00331379 push EBX 0033137a push ESI 0033137b push EDI 0033137c Lea EDI, [ebp-0C
Reading Tips:
《Delphi Image ProcessingThe series focuses on efficiency. The general code is Pascal, and the core code is BaSm.
《C ++ Image ProcessingThe series focuses on code clarity and readability, and all uses C ++ code.
Make sure that the two items are consistent and can be compared with each other.
The code in this article must include the imagedata. Pas unit in "Delphi Image Processing-data type and public process.
The minimum value processing of an image is centered on the current pixel
the API function address we want to intercept, modify it.
Invoke GetModuleHandle, addr DllName; get the name of the DLL where the API is to be intercepted
Invoke GetProcAddress, eax, addr ApiName
Mov ProcAddr, eax; gets the address of the API we want to intercept and stores it in ProcAddr.
. While! ([Esi]. originalFirstThunk = 0 [esi]. timeDateStamp = 0 [esi]. forwarderChain = 0 [esi]. name1 = 0 [esi]. firstThunk = 0); The imported table is ended by an IMAGE_IMPORT_DESCRIPTOR of all 0.
Mov
The place that strcpy didn't take into account
Original posted Address:Http://eparg.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!59BFC22C0E7E1A76!1498.entryOriginal Paste Time:2006-08-16Original Paste Author:EpargThe discussions of the year were in:
Http://eparg.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!59BFC22C0E7E1A76!533.entry
When Http://eparg.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!59BFC22C0E7E1A76!875.entry first considered the performance of strcpy, only 4bytes copies were considered. But ignoring a key question is how to judge the end of
,
Then use SoftICE to set a breakpoint on the address, SoftICE should be immediately broken,
You'll see mov DWORD PTR ds:[eax+ecx*8+eb4],edi,
In the client, the position is 0x4b2c74,
You can change the course of the game,
Put mov DWORD PTR ds:[eax+ecx*8+eb4],
EDI changed into a E9 xx xx xx xx 90 90,
JMP the free address between the rsrc and. Data in the process.
The code (xx xx xx xx) + 0x4b2c74 + 5 is modi
#include #include int main (){__asm{CLD//empty flag bit DFPush 0X1E380A6A//press-in Messageboxa-->user32.dllPush 0x4fd18963//press-in Exitprocess-->kernel32.dllPush 0x0c917432//press-in Loadlibrarya-->kernel32.dllmov Esi,esp//esi=esp, pointing to the address in the stack where LoadLibraryA is storedLea Edi,[esi-0xc]//edi = stack top position -0xc, e.g. 0x0012ff28-0xc==0x0012ff1c====== open up some stack spa
Debug versionESP stack top pointerEBP holds stack pointer Empty program: Int main () { 00411360 push ebp, press into EBP 00411361 mov ebp,esp; EBP = ESP, keep esp, wait for function call to resume, ESP is definitely used in a function call. 00411363 Sub esp,0c0h; esp-=0c0h (192); Leave temporary storage for the function ; put the values in other pointers or registers into the stack to use them in the function. 00411369 push ebx; Press into EBX 0041136A push esi, press into ESI 0041136B pu
From [wenjuliu25]: HelloWorld disassembly Analysis
Lab environment:Visual c ++ 6.0
Objective: To analyze the memory allocation of a simple c program during program execution using assembly language
/******* Mymain. cpp *********/
1: # include
2: int main ()
3 :{
4: int x = 1;
5: printf ("Hello Canney \ n ");
6: return0;
7 :}
/******* Mymain. asm *********/
1: # include
2: int main ()
3 :{
00410950 push ebp
00410951 mov ebp, esp
00410953 sub ESP, 44 h // ESP = esp-0x40, allocate stack space t
CPU switches from user mode to privileged mode, then jump to the kernel code to execute the exception handling program.In the "B INT" command, the value 0x80 is a parameter. In exception handling, the parameter determines how to handle the problem. In the Linux kernel, an int 0x80 exception is called a system call.The values of C eax and EBX registers are two parameters passed to the system call. The value of eax is the system call number, 1 indicates _ exit call, and EBX indicates the paramete
;//////////////////////////////; First get the relocation difference
Call rebaseRebase:Pop EBP;Sub EBP, offset rebase;; Get the kernel32.dll's base address; By peb direct access; Place in here not routine; Because we need it afterAssume FS: nothing;
MoV eax, FS: [30 h]; PTR _ TebMoV eax, [eax + 0ch]; PTR _ peb_ldr_dataMoV eax, [eax + 1ch]; list_entry ininitializationordermodulelist. flinkMoV eax, [eax]; flink's flinkMoV eax, [eax + 08 h]; The Kernel32's base addressMoV [EBP + dwbase], eax;MoV EC
about some personal opinions. Next, we will conduct some small tests and explain them in assembly language. You can do it together.
(1) Char name [] and char * Name
1:2: void process()3: {00401020 push ebp00401021 mov ebp,esp00401023 sub esp,4Ch00401026 push ebx00401027 push esi00401028 push edi00401029 lea edi,[ebp-4Ch]0040102C mov ecx,13h00401031 mov eax,0C
the arguments of the constructor, and is initialized with 1, which omits a step, speeds up the operation, and achieves the same effect. Note: In the above assembly, Visual Studio compiler optimizations have been turned off, indicating that this approach has been used as a general method of Visual Studio, rather than as a vs-perceived optimization tool.Initialize 3:classtest ct3 = Ct1Classtest ct3 = ct1;//Copy Initialization00b09538 Lea Eax,[ct1]00b0953e push EAX00b0953f Lea ECX,[CT3]00b09545 ca
The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion;
products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the
content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem
within 5 days after receiving your email.
If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to:
info-contact@alibabacloud.com
and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.