esp 3250

Think: Why function templates can be put together with function overloading. How does the C + + compiler provide a mechanism for function templates?Demo 1#include Compile the demo 1 into a compilation file to view:. File "1.cpp". Lcomm __zstl8__ioinit,1,1.def___main;. SCl2;. Type32;. Endef.section. Rdata, "Dr" Lc0:.ascii "x:%d y:%d \12\0" Lc1:.ascii "a:%c b:%c \12\0". def___gxx_personality_sj0;. SCl2;. Type32;. Endef.def__unwind_sjlj_register;. SCl2;. Type32;. Endef.def__unwind_sjlj_unregister;.

: * Use JMP to disrupt the code. This is not a new trick, but it still works. * Use JMP to wrap multiple functions together. In this way, the analysts cannot find where the function starts and ends. * Change call. The attacker is extremely sensitive to call, which makes it impossible to find a call. For example, I can change call sub1: Mov eax, offset sub1 + 3Push offset @ 1 sub eax, 3Jmp eax@ 1: * Get rid of ret. The attacker is extremely sensitive to ret, so that he cannot find a ret. For exam

exits. If you enter an invalid registration code, you are not prompted to exit directly. We only need to find the fifth place to exit without reason.Double-clickCode:00403B6F |. FF15 30804000 call dword ptr [CopyCode:Call dword ptr [408030]Ctrl + F searchCode:Call dword ptr [408030]A total of 10 locations are found, except the four. There are four more.First look at the last two.Code:00404000. E8 25270000 call 00404005. 8B48 04 mov ecx, dword ptr [eax + 4]00404008. E8 09290000 call 0040400D. 8D

Compilation mode: DebugCompiling environment: Microsoft Visual Studio ultimate 2013 (12.0.30501.00) Update 2//////////////////////////////////////// //////////////////////////////////////1. New []:C ++ code:Int * lpnum = new int [16]; Assembly code:Push 0x40; new applied space sizeCall XXXXXXXX; call NewAdd ESP, 0x4; _ cdeclMoV dword ptr ss: [EBP-0xD4], eax; returns the return value (address of the applied space) to the temporary variable (guess used

/prot/port): (0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0) current_peer: required bytes limit 2permit, flags = {origin_is_acl,} # pkts encaps: 26, # pkts encrypt: 26, # pkts digest 26 # pkts decaps: 4, # pkts decrypt: 4, # pkts verify 4 # pkts compressed: 0, # pkts decompressed: 0 # pkts not compressed: 0, # pkts compr. failed: 0, # pkts decompress failed: 0 # send errors 0, # recv errors 0 local crypto endpt.: encryption limit 20.1, remote crypto endpt.: too many connections 2path mtu 1500, media mtu 1500 current outb

Transport layer (TCP,UDP), so it is transparent to the application.(4) IPSec is transparent to the end user, there is no need to conduct security training for users, to assign a key to each user, or to remove the key when the user leaves the organization.6. Security services provided by IPSec(1) No connection integrity and access control.(2) Identification of the data source.(3) The group that rejects the replay.(4) confidentiality (encryption).(5) Limited amount of traffic confidentiality.7. I

Write a blog this afternoon, analysis and analysis of the nature of the function call in C, first we know that the essence of the function in C is a piece of code, but give the code a name, this name is his code of the beginning of the addressThis is also the essence of the function name, in fact, the label in the assembly. Below we will be exposed to some things such as the EIP is what we often say the program counter, as well as EBP and ESP (here ar

Process 0*/Task[pid].pid = pid;//Initialize process # No. 0Task[pid].state = 0;/*-1 unrunnable, 0 runnable, >0 stopped *///state is runningTask[pid].task_entry = Task[pid].thread.ip = (unsigned long) my_process;//entrance is myprocessTASK[PID].THREAD.SP = (unsigned long) task[pid].stack[kernel_stack_size-1];//stack stack topTask[pid].next = task[pid];//just started it itself, so next also points to its own/*fork more process *///create more processesfor (i=1;i{memcpy (task[i],task[0],sizeof (TP

, and it is cumbersome to save each register using push, Intel provides an instruction Pushad to hold the values of all common registers IRET and iretdis the mnemonic for the same opcode. The iretd mnemonic (interrupt return double word) is used to return an interrupt that uses a 32-bit operand size, but most assemblers use the IRET mnemonic interchangeably for both operands. 3. Process scheduling Approximate process PCB:The PCB is used to describe the process, it is independent of the proc

that it is behind the fscanf function in the source program, so in the disassembly, its position is also behind the fscanf. It is necessary to briefly describe the call implementation principle. It is divided into two steps. The first step is to push the current instruction location to the stack in the memory, that is, to save the return address (the address saved by the EIP, that is, the next instruction of the call, the second step is to jump to the entrance of the called function. Go to this

bar ~)./* * Saving eflags is important. It switches notonly IOPL between tasks, * It also protects other tasks from NT Leakingthrough sysenter etc. */#defineswitc H_to (prev, Next, last) do { /* * Context-s Witching clobbers All registers, Sowe clobber * them explicitly, via unused outputvariables. * (EAX and EBP are not listed because EBP issaved/restored * explicitly for Wchan access a

_ stdcall is the same when it first enters the subfunction. The top of the stack pointed to by ESP is the return address. This is pushed into the stack by the call command. The following are the parameters, the left parameter is on the top, and the right parameter is on the bottom (first on the stack ). As shown in the previous table, the difference between __cdecl and _ stdcall is: __cdecl is the stack occupied by the caller to clean up the paramete

Frame pointer omission (FPO) FPO is an optimization that compresses or omits the process of creating framework pointers for the function on the stack. This option accelerates function calling because you do not need to create or remove the framework pointer (ESP, EBP. At the same time, it also freed up a register to store frequently used variables. This optimization is available only in the intelcpu architecture. Any call convention that has be

-4] 00401273 call @ ILT + 0 (Manager ::~ Manager) (00401005) 00401278 pop EDI 00401279 pop ESI 004020.a pop EBX 004010000b add ESP, 44 h 0040da-e cmp ebp, ESP 00401280 call _ chkesp (00408760) 00401285 mov ESP, EBP 00401287 pop EBP We found that the manager structure and analysis structure are also simple. A constructor is constructed

program can return the correct position of the main program and continue execution. For example, call the main function named add assembler module: Main (){...... add (DEST, OP1, OP2, flages );......}. In this example, the main function is de-assembled, and the main function automatically organizes the stack before calling the Add function....Lea 0xfffffffe8 (% EBP), % eax # The first address of the flages array into the stackPush % eaxPushl 0xfffffff8 (% EBP) # OP2 inbound StackPushl 0 xffffff

memory address for the value of the Register8. variable addressing: Changing the value of a register when indirectly addressing9. The Linux kernel uses the/T assembly format10. EIP registers cannot be directly modified and can only be modified indirectly by special instructions11. The function call stack is superimposed on a logically multiple stack.12. The return value of the function is returned to the upper-level function by default using the EAX register storePre-execution stack, both

Document directory Test Results I read two articles (the impact of inline script location on performance) ,Positioning inline scripts ), I'm a little excited about my regular habits and will be skeptical. To solve the problem, I did a test. The test code is as follows: Test Results Time required for page loading (excluding images), in milliseconds: Put the script behind the style IE6: 3250 3266 3141 3140 3250