pentaho review

As we all know, the postgraduate entrance exam is a systematic and massive project that needs to be fully grasped. In this year or half a year, how do I organize my own review plan? How can I effectively manage my review time? How can we greatly improve learning efficiency through scientific review planning and time management? These are undoubtedly the most impo

Address: http://www.phabricator.com/docs/phabricator/article/Audit_User_Guide.html OverviewPhabricator supports two code review workflows: Review (pre-submission review) and Audit (post-Submission review ).This document outlines the post-Submission review process using the a

developers tempted users to perform fraudulent IAP. In fact, there is indeed a malicious in-app payment phenomenon. Currently, the in-APP purchase specification is a good third-party specification for users and developers, and apple. Although Apple's policy is tough and sometimes unfriendly, its strict review standards are indeed justified in the Dropbox incident. But why does most media think this is an audit error, or even Apple's intention? There

This tweet is a former colleague to share the time of the PPT, here I sorted out to share to everyone What is code review?Code review is a quality assurance mechanism that verifies code implementation by systematically checking the source code during the software development process.Why not do code review? Business needs are big and working hours ar

The Sprint Review Conference has long been an important part of scrum, a mechanism for the team to get feedback on the product increments that are delivered by the iteration. At the Sprint review meeting, the product owner determines the priority of the next sprint's requirements based on the feedback received.So, is the sprint review now obsolete?Ten years ago,

Why code Review is requiredRecently read some articles, found that some of the ideas of agile development more and more teams in practice, also feel that agile is no longer as early as the time so virtual, there are many tools to embody this concept emerges. Among them, "How to improve the quality of code" has been a lot of discussion, agile development also has a good variety of proposals, the most well-known, but also the most unreliable should be p

This article organizes the basic process of submitting code to the OpenStack community, as well as some information about the community. If there is reprint, please indicate the source!Let's take a picture to illustrate the general flow of OpenStack code review:The process for submitting code changes to OpenStack is mainly as follows: Configuring Git and Gerrit Environments Clone the code of the target project and make changes on the new branch Commit to a local repo and push it

First, learning Ladder division:First-order Basis comprehensive review (March ~ June)Second-order reinforcement familiarity (July ~ October)Third-order mode to examine the lack of traps (November ~ December 15th)Four-stage finishing touch-up status (December 16 ~ Pre-exam)Ii. Bibliography:Essential Resources:Math Exam Syllabus"Advanced Mathematics" Tongji version: To explain the more detailed, difficult questions moderate, involving a wide range of co

As mentioned in the previous article, I no longer work in Google. I have not figured out where to go-there are two or three very good job opportunities in front of me. Because during this decision period, I was no longer employed by anyone. I wanted to write something professional, something interesting, however, it also causes tension between colleagues and management work. Google is a very good company. They have made a lot of commendable things-both outside the company, what people can see,

Literature Review is an academic paper written after comprehensive analysis of a large amount of information collected from a topic. It is a scientific document. Literature reviews reflect the latest progress, academic opinions, and suggestions of a certain branch or important topic in a certain field. They often reflect the new trends, new trends, new levels, new principles, and new technologies of relevant issues. and so on. Students are required to

Use LaravelModeration extension to implement a simple content review system in Laravel applications 1. Introduction Laravel Moderation is based on Laravel 5. * The implemented simple content review system allows or rejects requests to application resources, such as articles, comments, and users, in order to keep the app Pure by blocking content that is offensive, offensive, or insulting. Simply put, it is

Chen nengtech 2007-9-20 Original article:"44" metrics for test case review without tiveness-http://davidfrico.com/roi-metrics-f.htm 1. Major defects per test case reviewMajor defects found in each reviewed test case2. minor defects per test case reviewSecondary defects discovered in each reviewed test case 3. Total defects per test case reviewTotal number of defects discovered in each reviewed test case 4. Ratio of major to minor defects per test cas

Guidance:CodeReview has been widely recognized as a very good practice. Many large companies such as Google are also doing code review. Code review not only helps your work, but also shares knowledge. The original Article is code reviews in the 21st century. This article is now compiled.ArticleThe content is as follows: Code review can end in the software engin

Automatically submit a code review request using RbtoolObjectiveLet's recall the process of submitting a review request manually: First you have to generate the diff file with svn diff > filename.diff. Then enter the URL of the review board, which may be rb.companyname.com You will then need to enter your account password for login verification.

Code Review Chinese should be translated as "code review" or "code review". This is a process. When a developer writes the code, he/she needs to let others review its code, this is an effective way to discover bugs. Therefore, we can review the code style, logic, and ideas .

Attitude determines everything: Code Review, as an important part of software development, is also a link with a high degree of interaction between people. The attitude of participants on Code Review will greatly affect the effect of Code Review. Programmers are a group of people who are not good at communicating with others. In this way, there may be a big gap i

Code review is one of the most important ways to eliminate bugs, and these reviews are particularly effective most of the time. Because the code review itself is aimed at the object, is to overlook the entire code in the testing process of problems and bugs. Also, code reviews can help eliminate some of the special details of errors, especially those that are easily found when reading code, which are often

Code review ensures that Code Quality is an important part. Its main work is: 1. Discover bugs in the Code; 2. Check the code quality from the perspective of code maintainability and scalability, and propose suggestions for modification. 1. bugs in the Code mainly appear in the following two places:(1) bugs unrelated to business logic.For example, the stream, file, and connection opened in the system are not closed in time, thread safe problems e

We often hear team members say: "This project is a waste of time doing code reviews. ” "I don't have time to do code reviews. ” "The conference was delayed because my despicable colleague had not reviewed my code. ” "Can you believe that my colleague actually asked me to change my code?" I'm so graceful and perfect where the code needs to be changed. ” Why do we have to do code review? One of the most important goals of any professional software dev

First, I started in September 2015 to prepare for 803--, which is the computer science and technology major . Now smoothed the plan, I was the review of each of the subjects were divided into three paragraphs: the first stage, combined with the review of all the knowledge of the teaching materials to all-round scanning, fully understand and understand, in fact, follow the