postgresql performance comparison

Discover postgresql performance comparison, include the articles, news, trends, analysis and practical advice about postgresql performance comparison on alibabacloud.com

Notes Performance comparison of the string assembling mode of Go language

,"["V"]"},"") Case 3://Temporary bytes. BufferB: =bytes. buffer{} b.writestring ("[") b.writestring (v) b.writestring ("]") s=b.string () Case 4://Stable bytes. BufferBuf. WriteString ("[") buf. WriteString (v) buf. WriteString ("]") } ifi = = N1 { ifindex = =4{//For stable bytes. Buffers =buf. String ()} FMT. Println (Len (s))//consume s to avoid compiler optimization}} T1:=Time . Now () d=t1. Sub (t0) fmt. Printf ("Time of the (%d) =%v\n", index, D)returnD}func

Comparison of Ado.net Entity Framework query performance

About Ado.net Entity Framework Performance Comparison There's a lot on the web, here I'm just a preliminary introduction the Ado.net Entity Framework uses different methods to query for different performance of data Part I: Querying a single entity repeatedly First: Linq to Entitiess The code is as follows: static void Main(string[] args)          {          

Performance comparison of memcached and Redis

Recently, a project needs to use NO-SQL database to save a lot of data, insert and query are more frequent, relatively more frequent query. Is it the choice of memcached or Redis? Memcached and Redis to do a related test, you know. Memcached and Redis test comparison: 1 Performance aspects: Same number of write and read data, key is UUID, value is analog terminal information about 600 bytes Single Thread: M

SQL query enforces hash connection performance test comparison

be used Use_hash (table_name1 table_name2) hint to force a HASH join 1. Hash joins are a common way for the CBO to make large data set connections. 2. You can also use the Use_hash (table_name1 table_name2) hint to force a hash connection 3.Hash join when the amount of data in two tables varies greatly. The 4.Hash join works by hashing a table (usually a smaller table), storing the column data in a hash list, extracting records from another table, doing hash operations, and finding the correspo

JSP pages, performance comparison of result set pagination and SQL (top) paging

2009 40----result set pagination2--11start time Mon Oct 16:33:37 CST 20092---55end time Mon Oct 16:34:12 CST 2009 35200--11start time Mon Oct 16:34:59 CST 2009---55end time Mon Oct 16:35:32 CST 2009 3320000--11start time Mon Oct 16:36:26 CST 200920000---55end time Mon Oct 16:36:59 CST 2009 33210000--11start time Mon Oct 16:38:00 CST 2009210000---55end time Mon Oct 16:38:33 CST 2009 33100000--11start time Mon Oct 16:39:10 CST 2009100000---55end time Mon Oct 16:39:43 CST 2009 33JSP pages,

Oracle 11g IFS VS iffs Performance Comparison

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------Plan Hash value:1131838604---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU) | Time |---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 5 | 3335 (1) | 00:00:41 || 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 5 | | || 2 | INDEX FAST full SCAN

Comparison between SQL Cartesian product query and correlated query performance

Tags: experience note method Bubuko class style Targe each nameFirst of all, SQL will be used to understand, not experts, the following are working experience, talk to lyric.Today to help verify the port of colleagues published, look at the relevant SQL content, found that its use of SQL statements will lead to Cartesian product phenomenon, in order to help explain the following analysis:Student table:Teacher Table:Course Table:Student_course table:SQL1 query statements similar to the problem fo

Common CPU and graphics performance comparison analysis (not updated regularly)

22nm 17W 3MB i5-3230m 2.6GHz 3.2GHz 2/4 22nm 35W 3MB Analysis: I5-3337u can be seen as i5-3230m version (low-power version), performance loss is not small, if the pursuit of performance, select Ultra-polar, light and thin thi

Performance Parameter comparison

In the Internet era, when selecting a multi-functional Broadband Router, you have many reference standards. The following describes the performance of the multi-functional Broadband Router. Performance Parameter comparison It is not like some NICs and hubs have similar functions and performance, and the price is also b

Performance comparison of several go serialization libraries

This is a creation in Article, where the information may have evolved or changed. The serialized library is often used in the environment of network transmission, RPC, database access, and its performance directly affects the performance of the whole product.This article lists several high-performance go language serialization libraries and tests their

MemSQL, SQLFire, Oracle XE performance comparison test, memsqlsqlfire

MemSQL, SQLFire, Oracle XE performance comparison test, memsqlsqlfire 1. Software Version Memory SQL 3.1 Pivotal SQLFire 1.1.2 Oracle 11g XE 2. Test Environment Host OS: Windows 7 64-bit Professional Edition CPU: i7-3770 3.4 GHz Memory: 16 GB Hard Disk: larger than 800 GB Vmwarevm OS: CentOS 6.3 64-bit Memory: 16 GB MemSQL runs on virtual machines, and SQLFire and Oracle directly run on host machines. SQ

Canon SX60 HS and Canon 60D performance comparison detailed

To the photographic enthusiasts to share a detailed analysis of Canon SX60 HS and Canon 60D performance comparison. Compare and share: Canon SX60 HS uses 1/2.3 inch CMOS sensor, with 65 times times optical zoom lens, the equivalent focal length of 21 to 1365mm, Aperture f/3.4-6.5, with optical stabilization function, with DIGIC 6 image processor. and Canon 60D with a valid pixel of 18 million aps-

Detailed analysis of sample code for golang, python, php, c ++, c, java, and Nodejs performance comparison

This article describes performance comparison of golang, python, php, c ++, c, java, and Nodejs, for more information about golang, python, php, c ++, c, java, and Nodejs performance comparison When I was in PHP/C ++/Go/Py, I had a whim and wanted to make a simple comparison

Comparison and analysis of file_get_contents and curl performance in PHP _php skills

This article illustrates the comparison and analysis of file_get_contents and curl performance in PHP. Share to everyone for your reference. Specifically as follows: In PHP if not careful to analyze performance will find that file_get_contents and curl two have a lot in common, they can collect file open file, but if a careful

PHP include include_once require require_once performance comparison detailed _php tutorial

The article uses the graphic detailed introduction in PHP about include and include_once and require and require_once Performance Map, the need for friends can be detailed to see, but overall include_once and require_ Once performance is much better, especially when multiple calls are made. PHP Performance Optimization Eighth phase function, include () and includ

Simple read/write Performance Comparison Between ADO. NET, NBear, and nhib.pdf

ADO. NET, and nhib.pdf is about two times slower. Given that the average system read operation frequency is much higher than the write operation frequency, the average performance of NBear should be much better than that of nhib.pdf. The test is not complete. It is for reference only.Read Performance Comparison Repeat Times ADO. NET (MS) NBear (MS

PHPinclude () file inclusion performance comparison-PHP source code

Performance Comparison of include single files and multi-files: require_once and include are the two most common functions for PHP programmers. through these two functions, we can use the classes and other objects defined in other class libraries. However, many users simply use the following code to reference other files in the same directory. Include performance

Performance comparison of various traversal modes of Java map

1. ElaborationFor the way in which map is traversed in Java, many articles recommend using EntrySet, which is more efficient than keyset. The reason is: The EntrySet method gets all the keys and value at once, and keyset gets only the set of keys, and for each key, it goes to the map to find the value in extra time, thus reducing the overall efficiency. So what's the real story?To understand the real difference in traversal performance, including the

Simple comparison of HTTPS, Spdy and HTTP/2 performance

Chinese Original: HTTPS, Spdy and HTTP/2 a simple comparison of performanceFinishing from: A simple performance Comparison of HTTPS, SPDY and HTTP/2Please respect the copyright, reproduced please indicate the source, thank you! These days, mobile phones have been hijacked by Unicom, with the Daily news will be inserted into the spam ads, let alone in the vi

Java Various reflection performance comparison

(Timeunit.milliseconds)); SYSTEM.OUT.PRINTLN (result); }}3. Test resultsRun the above test on the 4-core [email protected] machine, after several measurements, basically around the following range of values, the test data is as follows:1. Directget 100000000 times using Notoginseng ms2. Reflectasmget 100000000 times using ms3. Javareflectget 100000000 times using 222 ms4. PropertyGet 100000000 times using 335 ms5. Beanutilsget 100000000 times using 20066 ms4. Results Analysis1.

Total Pages: 15 1 .... 10 11 12 13 14 15 Go to: Go

Contact Us

The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion; products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem within 5 days after receiving your email.

If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to: info-contact@alibabacloud.com and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.

A Free Trial That Lets You Build Big!

Start building with 50+ products and up to 12 months usage for Elastic Compute Service

  • Sales Support

    1 on 1 presale consultation

  • After-Sales Support

    24/7 Technical Support 6 Free Tickets per Quarter Faster Response

  • Alibaba Cloud offers highly flexible support services tailored to meet your exact needs.