postgresql performance comparison

Discover postgresql performance comparison, include the articles, news, trends, analysis and practical advice about postgresql performance comparison on alibabacloud.com

Analysis of SQL Server paging mode IsNull and coalesce performance comparison _mssql

]. [dbo]. [Table]. [C] is not NULL THEN [tempdb]. [dbo]. [Table]. [C] ELSE case when [tempdb]. [dbo]. [Table]. [d] is not NULL THEN [tempdb]. [dbo]. [Table]. [d] ELSE case when [tempdb]. [dbo]. [Table]. [E] is not NULL THEN [tempdb]. [dbo]. [Table]. [E] ELSE case when [tempdb]. [dbo]. [Table]. [F] is not NULL THEN [tempdb]. [dbo]. [Table]. [F] ELSE [tempdb]. [dbo]. [Table]. [g] End-end-end-end (5) Comparison of

Full-text retrieval performance comparison of databases

Http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1037991/how-much-more-performant-is-postgres-than-mysql-on-fulltext-search I ran benchmarks a few years ago on large datasets and found that: MySQL FULLTEXT Is pretty slow. another drawback is that it forces MyISAM on you which brings a lot of problems. also index updates are quite slow once the index reaches a certain size: when you insert a new row, a substantial part of the index is re-generated, sometimes a few hundred megabytes of index are rewritten ju

Cocos2d-js and Createjs Performance comparison (HTML5)

-handsome rich use.Interested friends, you can pick up the phone to sweep, to see how your phone test situation, with a sticker.COCOS2D-JS:Createjs:Summary:Overall, because Cocos2d-js can be rendered on WebGL, performance is better than Createjs. Compared to the rendering on canvas 2d, Createjs and Cocos2d-js are not alike, not much difference, especially in mobile phones (Android) is basically a waste, mobile phone's canvas2d game/animation can only

Redis2.4 and 2.6 Performance Comparison

: 41788.55 requests per secondINCR: 41823.50 requests per secondLPUSH: 36179.45 requests per secondLPOP: 41067.76 requests per secondSADD: 41823.50 requests per secondSPOP: 41305.25 requests per secondLPUSH (needed to benchmark LRANGE): 41254.12 requests per secondLRANGE_100 (first 100 elements): 17618.04 requests per secondLRANGE_300 (first 300 elements): 6311.94 requests per secondLRANGE_500 (first 450 elements): 4240.16 requests per secondLRANGE_600 (first 600 elements): 3283.75 requests per

FirefoxJavaScript performance comparison: Wine is better than Linux

Article title: FirefoxJavaScript performance comparison: Wine is also better than Linux. Linux is a technology channel of the IT lab in China. Includes basic categories such as desktop applications, Linux system management, kernel research, embedded systems, and open source. TuxRadar.com is a website for Linux enthusiasts. it is not blindly superstitious, but thinks that Linux also has many shortcomings to

Use in_array () foreacharray_search () in php to find whether the array contains performance comparison

This article mainly introduces the performance comparison of using in_array () foreacharray_search () in php to find whether an array contains data. if you need to know whether a character contains an array, there are many ways to solve this problem. new users who are just learning php tend to use loops to solve the problem. for small websites, this solution will not cause any major problems. However, in te

[Wind Terminator] PHPfor/foreach/while performance comparison

[Rumor Terminator] PHPforforeachwhile has better performance than my female friend who told me: Oh, well, I 'd like to hear other people say that the best foreach in php should not use for, because the performance will be better. my first reaction was that it was impossible. The second reaction was to think about why others had such a conclusion. I guess some of my children's papers use the following form f

Vdbench and FIO Test Disk performance Comparison summary

) Edit Test Script file Test1 (test native piece of disk) hd=default,vdbench=/var/www/html/vdbench504,user=root,shell=ssh sd=sd1,lun=/dev/vdc,openflags=o_direct,threads=1 wd=wd1,sd=sd1,xfersize=16k,readpct=0,seekpct=100 rd=rd1,wd=wd1,iorate=max,elapsed=120,maxdata=5500g,interval=1,warmup=30 Test native two disk (and so on) hd=default,vdbench=/var/www/html/vdbench504,user=root,shell=ssh sd=sd1,lun=/dev/vdc,openflags=o_direct,threads=1 sd=sd2,lun=/dev/vdb,openflags=o_d

Performance Comparison of open-source JSON libraries: JSON. simple/GSON/Jackson/JSONP, jsongson

Performance Comparison of open-source JSON libraries: JSON. simple/GSON/Jackson/JSONP, jsongsonWhich JSON library in Java has the fastest parsing speed? JSON has become a widely accepted standard for data transmission between servers and WEB applications. However, as many of the things we have become accustomed to, you will naturally think about it without further thinking. We seldom think about the differe

Use in_array () foreacharray_search () in php to find whether the array contains performance comparison-PHP source code

This article mainly introduces the performance comparison of using in_array () foreacharray_search () in php to find whether an array is contained. if you need it, refer to the next article to introduce how to use in_array () in php () foreach array_search () to check whether the array contains Performance Comparison.

Comparison of the Performance of a Group using the LinQ to SQL and non-LinQ methods.

Comparison of the Performance of a Group using the LinQ to SQL and non-LinQ methods. A data table with 476550 data records. Group A field and sort it by the field. This requirement is implemented by using the methods of LinQ to SQL and non-LinQ respectively, and then let's take a look at the performance comparison. Li

Comparison of several methods and performance pairs for obtaining letters in the corresponding location of the alphabet in python

Python methods for obtaining letters in the corresponding location of the alphabet and Performance Comparison of several methods for obtaining letters in the corresponding location of the alphabet in python and performance comparison In some cases, we need to find out the alphabetic order of letters, A = 1, B = 2, C =

PHP inlcude () Performance comparison detailed _php tutorial

better way, we often add the following code in the routing file or other initialization file: Copy CodeThe code is as follows: Define (' App_path ', Realpath (dirname (_file_))); This is equivalent to adding a global variable to the system to indicate the root of the system, and we can use the following code when we need to refer to a file in a specific path later: Copy CodeThe code is as follows: Include (App_path. Directory_separator. ' Models '. ' User.php '); AutoLoad and include

Comparison of performance of different poll implementations

Epoll scalability web page Introduction Interface Description Man pages Testing Dphttpd Dphttpd SMP results Dphttpd up results Pipetest Pipetest results Recent comparison results Analysis and conclusions Acknowledgements Introduction Davide libenzi wrote an event poll implementation and described it at the/dev/epoll home page here. his performance testing led to the conclusion tha

Performance Comparison Between dataset-bound paging and generic + object-class Paging

In my projects, dataset is used a lot, which leads to fast development and low training costs. In addition, dataset itself works well with the development of gridview, and many clever methods use dataset to bind them for better processing. For example, dynamic fields and metadata fields. If the generic type is used, the modification of the object class may occur. Some people may say that dataset is very inefficient. In fact, if the application scenario is suitable, the

X86Vs minicomputer performance comparison (1)

definition is somewhat vague. In fact, SUN is still different from x86 and the iSCSI system based on the RISC instruction set, and is used as an enterprise-level system in the iSCSI. The situation of UNIX systems in the server market Considering the market by system scale, the low-end market is dominated by x86 systems, while the high-end market is dominated by mainframes. The two are flooded with UNIX and x86 systems. With the improvement of the performanc

Performance comparison of WCF's restful and TCP-style calls

, WCF will automatically release the server set up the 6211-port case, you can see the average call time is: 0.59~0.61 millisecondsTest 2: Service is provided on a TCP basis, and the client accesses the service using the interface Libary Reference class library:TCP Service Address: net.tcp://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6212/itstemplate.study.restapi/seqservice/Two client, 100,000 calls, average call time: 2.66 sBefore the call can be done by netstat-aon|findstr "6212", TCP has not yet been invoked by the cl

Web Hello World performance test comparison of Go language and Java+jetty

This is a creation in Article, where the information may have evolved or changed. The company now has a restful architecture for search services using Java + jetty; Jetty's simplicity and efficiency has always been a favorite, the restful architecture of search has been stable for two years, but the soft load keepalived want to add some business control module, but keepalived no special development interface, their new development of a set? High cost and pe

Performance comparison of POW () function and direct multiplication--taking camel function as an example

multiplicationDoubleFUNC2 (ConstvectorDouble> State ) { Doublex = state[0]; Doubley = state[1]; DoubleF; F= (4-2.1*x*x + POW (x,4) /3.0) *x*x + X*y + (-4+4.0* y*y) *y*y; returnF;}//Func3: All with the POW () function to calculateDoubleFUNC3 (ConstvectorDouble> State ) { Doublex = state[0]; Doubley = state[1]; DoubleF; F= (4-2.1*pow (x,2) + POW (x,4) /3.0) *pow (x,2) + X*y + (-4+4.0* POW (Y,2)) *pow (Y,2); returnF;}intmain () {vectorDouble> Initialstate (2); initialstate[0] =0.0898; initia

SSD Performance Comparison

SSD Performance testSequential Write 16k ioPS 85061.08Sequential Write 8k ioPS 146250.93Sequential Write 4k ioPS 239816.69Sequential write 2k ioPS 294540.87Sequential Write 1k ioPS 347170.06Random Write 16k ioPS 21865.24Random Write 8k ioPS 26602.18Random Write 4k ioPS 34485.49Random write 2k ioPS 35115.20Random Write 1k ioPS 34913.40Sequential Read 16k ioPS 157199.17Sequential Read 8k ioPS 239133.22Sequential Read 4k ioPS 361864.16Sequential read 2k

Total Pages: 15 1 .... 11 12 13 14 15 Go to: Go

Contact Us

The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion; products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem within 5 days after receiving your email.

If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to: info-contact@alibabacloud.com and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.

A Free Trial That Lets You Build Big!

Start building with 50+ products and up to 12 months usage for Elastic Compute Service

  • Sales Support

    1 on 1 presale consultation

  • After-Sales Support

    24/7 Technical Support 6 Free Tickets per Quarter Faster Response

  • Alibaba Cloud offers highly flexible support services tailored to meet your exact needs.