. (4) Finally, it is necessary to determine the nodes that are not compared, append these nodes to the subsequent nodes of Q, and return p as the result.(5) The comparison process is simple as follows:Example: L1:1->3->5->13 l2:2->4->14->17(A) l1=1,l2=2,l1(B) L1=3,l2=2,l1>l2, at this time, q.next=l2=2,q=q.next=2,l2=l2.next=4;(C) L1=3,l2=4,l1(D) L1=5,l2=4,l1>l2, at this time, q.next=l2=4,q=q.next=4,l2=l2.next=14;(E) L1=5,l2=14,l1(F) L1=13,l2=14,l1(G) Since L1 is empty, the subsequent nodes in the
TopicMerge sorted linked lists and return it as a new list. The new list should is made by splicing together the nodes of the first of the lists.AnalysisDon't forget to first determine whether the list of two lists is empty. The rest can be implemented using both recursive and non-recursive methods.CodeRecursive mode:Class Solution {public: listnode* mergetwolists (listnode* L1, listnode* L2) { li
link the remaining segments of the other table to the node referred to by C.
You can write and read my thoughts first. Comments are welcome.
The function body is as follows:
1 void mergelist_l (list * a, list * B, list * C) {2 // The two linked lists passed in are both non-descending order 3 // The merged C linked list is also non-descending order 4 node * A = A-> head; 5 Node * B = B-> head; 6 if (a-> value> = B-> value) {7 C-> head = B-> head; 8 B
The title is, give you two sorted linkedlist, then merge them into a new linkedlist. The idea is simple, is compare ListNode L1 and L2, which small put that node in the new list, and move the corresponding ListNode pointer (L1 or L2). Note that one is null, and the other is not NULL when you don't miss out.The code is as follows:1 /**2 * Definition for singly-linked list.3 * public class ListNode {4 * int val;5 * ListNode Next;6 * ListNode (int x) {va
The topic itself is simple, but there is a place worth remembering.Intuitive Error:Assuming that the length of the two list is from 0, a length of M, and a length of N, what is the sum of the two lengths? Intuition tells you it is m+n, but the truth is that it is m+n+1.void merge (int a[], int m, int b[], int n) { if (m==0) while (n) {a[n-1]=b[n-1];n--;} int i=m-1; int j=n-1; while (I!=-1 j!=-1) {
Title: Input two monotonically increasing list, output two linked list of the linked list, of course, we need to synthesize the linked list to meet the monotone non-reduction rules.Idea: Sweep the maintenance increment again, and finally add the parts of the original linked list that may not be added PublicListNode Merge (listnode list1,listnode list2) {if(list1==NULLlist2==NULL)return NULL; if(list1==NULLlist2!=NULL)returnList2; if(list1!=NULLlist2=
Merge sorted linked lists and return it as a new list. The new list should is made by splicing together the nodes of the first of the lists.This problem is similar to the add two numbers, noting that there are unequal lengths, and considering the use of dummy node as the result of the head element, the time complexity O (n+m), n is the length of the two linked list respectively. Space complexity O (1). The
Problem descriptionMerge sorted linked lists and return it as a new list. The new list should is made by splicing together the nodes of the first of the lists.AlgorithmCode One1 PublicListNode mergetwolists (listnode l1,listnode L2) {2 if(l1==NULL)3 returnL2;4 if(l2==NULL)5 returnL1;6 ListNode l3,p;7 if(l1.vall2.val) {8l3=L1;9p=L1;Tenl1=L1.next; One}Else{ Al3=L2; -p=L2; -L2=L2.next; the } -
Problem:Merge K sorted linked lists and return it as one sorted list. Analyze and describe its complexity. Tags Divide and conquer Linked List HeapMerging K ordered single linked listsThinking:(1) The problem does not require the new open listnode, so brute force: Extract k List of keywords, sorting, new node insertion. This situation is not required for the original list to be ordered properly.Sorting time complexity can be done O (n log N), the extr
Topic:Merge k Sorted ListsMergek sorted linked lists and return it as one sorted list. Analyze and describe its complexity.Analysis:With Multiset as a small Gan, the multiset begin is the smallest node of value.Attention:1, because I have defined the multiset of the ordering method (that is, the value of the node to sort), so that two different node pointers, if their value is equal, it will be judged as "the same node." and set is not allowed to dupl
MergeKSorted linked lists and return it as one sorted list. analyze and describe its complexity.
Answer
/** * Definition for singly-linked list. * public class ListNode { * int val; * ListNode next; * ListNode(int x) { * val = x; * next = null; * } * } */public class Solution { public ListNode mergeTwoLists(ListNode l1, ListNode l2) { ListNode head=new ListNode(0); ListNode p; for(p=head;l1!=null
Merge k sorted linked lists and return it as one sorted list. analyze and describe its complexity. the solution to merging k sorting lists is to extract k elements for heap sorting. Each time the smallest elements are extracted, you can insert them into the linked list to note that this question uses the priority queue of c ++, the underlying layer of the priorit
/**21. Merge two Sorted Lists
* @param L1
* @param L2
* @return Merging two ordered lists/public
ListNode mergetwolists (Li Stnode L1, ListNode L2) {
listnode ret = new ListNode ( -1);
ListNode L = ret;
while (L1!= null L2!= null) {
if (L1.val
Improved: Linked list, so do not read each loop
public ListN
The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion;
products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the
content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem
within 5 days after receiving your email.
If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to:
info-contact@alibabacloud.com
and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.