realtek equalizer

: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP MEI Controller #1 (rev 03) 8 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP High Definition Audio Controller (rev 03) 9 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #1 (rev e3)10 00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #2 (rev e3)11 00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP PCI Express Root Port #3 (rev e3)12 00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Wildcat Point-LP PCI E

, then if there is a server connection number of 0, the equalizer directly forwarded the request to it, without the SED calculation.9, LBLC based on the least local connection. Based on the destination IP address of the request, the equalizer finds the server that the IP address was recently used, and forwards the request, if the server is overloaded, the least number of connection algorithms are used.10, L

. Theshortest expected delay of SED . In fact, SED is similar to WLC, except that the number of inactive connections is not considered. The algorithm is: (the number of active connections +1) *256÷ weight, the same calculated value of the small server priority is selected.8,NQ never queue . Improved SED algorithm. We think about the situation in order to "never queue", that is, the number of connections to the server is 0, then if there is a server connection number of 0, the

fact, SED is similar to WLC, except that the number of inactive connections is not considered. The algorithm is: (the number of active connections +1) *256÷ weight, the same calculated value of the small server priority is selected.8,NQ never queue . Improved SED algorithm. We think about the situation in order to "never queue", that is, the number of connections to the server is 0, then if there is a server connection number of 0, the equalizer dire

the number of inactive connections is not considered. The algorithm is: (the number of active connections +1) *256÷ weight, the same calculated value of the small server priority is selected.8,NQ never queue . Improved SED algorithm. We think about the situation in order to "never queue", that is, the number of connections to the server is 0, then if there is a server connection number of 0, the equalizer directly forwarded the request to it, without

considered. The algorithm is: (the number of active connections +1) *256÷ weight, the same calculated value of the small server priority is selected.8,NQ never queue . Improved SED algorithm. We think about the situation in order to "never queue", that is, the number of connections to the server is 0, then if there is a server connection number of 0, the equalizer directly forwarded the request to it, without the SED calculation.9,LBLC based on the l

them:First, the advantages of LVS:1, strong anti-load ability, because the LVS work mode logic is very simple, and work in the Network 4 layer only to do the request for distribution, no traffic, so in the efficiency of the basic need not too much consideration. In my hand, the LVS, just once the problem: in the concurrency of the highest period of time the equalizer packet loss, according to the analysis of network problems, that is, Nic or linux2.4

Comparison of load balance between LVS, Haproxy and NginxFrom the performance and stability of the most bull LVs, basically reached the F5 hardware equipment 60% performance, a few other 10% are a bit difficult. But because of the LVS bull, configuration is the most troublesome, and health testing needs to be configured Ldirector, other haproxy and nginx themselves, and the configuration super simple.If the site visits are not portal level with haproxy or nginx OK, to the portal level in the use

your knowledge and level of technology.Here's a look at both of them:First, the advantages of LVS:1, strong anti-load ability, because the LVS work mode logic is very simple, and work in the Network 4 layer only to do the request for distribution, no traffic, so in the efficiency of the basic need not too much consideration. In my hand, the LVS, just once the problem: in the concurrency of the highest period of time the equalizer packet loss, accordi

them:First, the advantages of LVS:1, strong anti-load ability, because the LVS work mode logic is very simple, and work in the Network 4 layer only to do the request for distribution, no traffic, so in the efficiency of the basic need not too much consideration. In my hand, the LVS, just once the problem: in the concurrency of the highest period of time the equalizer packet loss, according to the analysis of network problems, that is, Nic or linux2.4

considered. The algorithm is: (the number of active connections +1) *256÷ weight, the same calculated value of the small server priority is selected.8,NQ never queue . Improved SED algorithm. We think about the situation in order to "never queue", that is, the number of connections to the server is 0, then if there is a server connection number of 0, the equalizer directly forwarded the request to it, without the SED calculation.9,LBLC based on the l

delay of SED . In fact, SED is similar to WLC, except that the number of inactive connections is not considered. The algorithm is: (the number of active connections +1) *256÷ weight, the same calculated value of the small server priority is selected.8,NQ never queue . Improved SED algorithm. We think about the situation in order to "never queue", that is, the number of connections to the server is 0, then if there is a server connection number of 0, the equ