review udacity

One: The role of the review1 : Get things over withA: Review completed----> Find A sense of accomplishment B: Schedule Unfinished-----> Be aware2: Let the mood be over When things in the day are over, the heart will be completely put down, and the mood will naturally be put down. If things don't come to an conclusion-----> sometimes have unfinished things in the brain-----> start to feel nervous-------> cause a bad sleep.Second: A

In the area of software development, code review appears to be a controversial, fairly peaceful topic. The prevailing view is that code censorship is a good thing. Some companies or organizations even force the requirement to audit the code as a necessary process. Review is a good measure to catch bugs and problems. The ability to share domain knowledge and improve code quality through code reviews. Code

How to improve Team productivity In the fast-paced work, the team can often stop to reflect on the progress of the current work by means of "retrospective meeting", and find out what improvements to make based on the results of introspection. How can you better carry out a regular review meeting that will enable the team to continuously improve their work efficiency? Let's start with four simple questions ... How to play the greatest value of

Automatically submit a code review request using RbtoolObjectiveLet's recall the process of submitting a review request manually: First you have to generate the diff file with svn diff > filename.diff. Then enter the URL of the review board, which may be rb.companyname.com You will then need to enter your account password for login verification.

Code Review Chinese should be translated as "code review" or "code review". This is a process. When a developer writes the code, he/she needs to let others review its code, this is an effective way to discover bugs. Therefore, we can review the code style, logic, and ideas .

Attitude determines everything: Code Review, as an important part of software development, is also a link with a high degree of interaction between people. The attitude of participants on Code Review will greatly affect the effect of Code Review. Programmers are a group of people who are not good at communicating with others. In this way, there may be a big gap i

We often hear team members say: "This project is a waste of time doing code reviews. ” "I don't have time to do code reviews. ” "The conference was delayed because my despicable colleague had not reviewed my code. ” "Can you believe that my colleague actually asked me to change my code?" I'm so graceful and perfect where the code needs to be changed. ” Why do we have to do code review? One of the most important goals of any professional software dev

First, I started in September 2015 to prepare for 803--, which is the computer science and technology major . Now smoothed the plan, I was the review of each of the subjects were divided into three paragraphs: the first stage, combined with the review of all the knowledge of the teaching materials to all-round scanning, fully understand and understand, in fact, follow the

Through this class library, you can automatically analyze the input content and give a score. The program can determine whether the content has reached a certain sensitivity level based on this score, so as to perform corresponding automatic processing. If such a database is combined with a manual review, the results will be very good: the suspicious content of the server review is automatically submitted

First, describe it, And then summarize it, and finally design and implement it. Statement: 1. Save the documents to be submitted. After the operator makes a ticket, he may go to the toilet. He is in a hurry. Just as he writes a ticket on paper, he has not confirmed that the ticket should be sent to the superior leadership for review. 2. Submitted by the operator, indicating that the documents can be reviewed and self-reviewed. 3. The first

Gerrit code review server workflow and principles the Google Android open-source project has two important innovations in the use of git. One is the repo introduced for multi-version library collaboration, we have discussed this in detail before. Another important innovation is Gerrit, the code review server. Gerrit is mandatory for the code review introduced by

Personally understood, code review has two functions: 1. Two people are always more thoughtful than one person, looking at the angle of the problem it is easier to find bugs or find simpler and more effective solutions. The so-called onlooker sees most is the truth. 2. Ideally everyone in the team is familiar with every part of the project, but when the project is large it is not realistic, and the code review